There are plenty of ways to fix that, Gaijin just refuses to do anything lol
Though against planes, the Gepard-likes BRs are just another result of compression. If more nations had something like the M163, the Gepard-likes definitely could move up one or two steps.
But I guess having tracking and a lead indicator with a whole 1.5km of range (not even a search radar, literally just a track radar) is too OP at 7.3 lmao
Roland 3 is 2 br steps lower
10.0
Smh
not quite there is 1 difference between the 54C and 54C+
and that is the loadout options
F-14B:
F-14D:
that is due to any pheonix besides the 54C+ needs extra cooling equipment that is housed in the front ceneterline pylons, the 54C+ has internal cooling so that frees up the frontal pylons
Self contradicting statement.
Ok buddy
Have a nice day
Have they mentioned anything about decompressing Ground RB, particularly 7.7 and above?
From 10.0 to 10.7 is 2 steps, but now 2S6 is 11.0. The difference is much bigger.
They haven’t
If we’re lucky they raise the top BR, decompress the 10.0 to top BR range a bit and that’s it
They barely ever touch the mid and low BRs in meaningful ways, instead they just keep shuffling stuff around in that range
Gaijin:
Top tier is compressed, so we are dropping everything between 8.3 and 11.3 down 0.3 to decompress top tier
:P
If the F-14A IRIAF were to remain a 13.7 it needs:
More cms (at least 120)
Aim-9Ls
And a better radar
The F-14D with:
4 Aim-9ms
And 4 Aim-54s which weren’t even weak to begin with
And 640 cms if I recall right… is just monstrously good.
A buddy of mine whom isn’t the greatest pilot is currently averaging a 2.19 KDr with it (he’s playing 147 games) and his average KDr for air vehicles is about a 0.6
I would say Aim-9ms can be used more potently with the irst than a F-90 can be.
And I’ve used both a lot.
More like 6.3 and above.
And then there is a10c that fails to do well even without aa up because of its abysmal speed, climb rate and mavericks being garbage.
And of course devs just dont care.
Composito should have been, minimum, 4.0 alongside the M4A2 for ages now. Considering both have the late hulls and late turrets.
A-10C, mid af in air, mid af in ground, op in sim
love to see it
I mean, it’s an A-10, it’s one of those vehicles that just aren’t fit for WTs current gameplay loop
It really doesn’t deserve it.
The A4E doesn’t get any computers besides CCRP which is quite hard to use effectively.
Its only methods of a guaranteed kill are the GBU’s, which it only gets 3 of.
Its a Slow underpowered aircraft which is originally seen at 8.3 ARB but with LESS thrust
(3750Kg 8.0 GRB Vs 3470kg 9.3 GRB)
This aircraft struggles to get past 600Kph with just the 3 bombs not to mention it needs to be within 4-6km for a solid lock.
moving it up to 9.7 would be calling it on-par with the SU-25 which has:
-6 laser guided missiles
-2 370kg rockets
-2 30g R-60M’s (Vs 2x 10g Aim-9B’s…)
-256 CM’s (4.2x the CM’s of the A4E)
-Guns CCIP, bombs CCIP, rockets CCIP (A4E has none of those.)
conclusion: A4E is perfectly fine at 9.3 GRB.
9.7-12.3 technically
The Su-25 shouldn’t be at 10.0 to begin with, but a BR raise for the A-4E is hard to justify either way with the current amount of compression
Are you saying SU-25 is not good enough or too good for 10.0? Because its 9.7 now…
What? It’s 10.0 and it should go back up to 10.3
Edit: I’m dumb, the wiki still says 10.0
