depends how gaijin models it if its gonna be good
Wether they Model it as HVAP/APCR (terrible)
Similar to Russian 14.5 mm AP-I (Cermet) (good)
1 Like
To be honest I can’t really tell if the T-80UD/BE is fine at 11.0 or not.
The T-90A has better turret armour, hull armour (for the most part), 7s reload 3BM60, and LWS… while the T-80UD/BE gets a 6s reload 3BM42 with slightly better gun depression and slightly better vertical guidance speed.
5 Likes
It’s wack that the Turm III is still 8.3, yet the T58 went up in br.
8 Likes
Gaijin
where are the actual changes
Why are both Su-30 premiums STILL 13.3
considering the amount if suggestions on your first br changes post I find this incredibly disappointing
You repeatedly, consistently, without fail keep proving that none of you working on the balancing decisions are competent at what you are supposed to do
Something I really want to see is a livestream (with facecam) of whoever you are playing this game in all the brackets and gamemodes that suffer the most from these balancing issues so we can see how you feel about the cancer you have created
Please,
just actually play your own game for once
4 Likes
how are 28+ posts specifically about the premium Su-30s not enough to prove they are undertiered?
how much more proof do you need?
this plane is on par with the J-11A in performance, both of which are better than literally every other 13.3 plane and even some 13.7s in air RB
How in the hell are you supposed to justify this gaijin
Please give us an actual response instead of silence or copy-paste bs through smin
7 Likes
Its a gimmick. Good luck hiting anything
What Chieftain Mk10/900 once did to 8.0s, TTD is now doing to 9.0s.
1 Like
It can be both and still warrant an increase. But its still something many competitors don’t have access too. Correct me if I am wrong here, but the ATGM launchers are stabilized alongside the gun, are they not? So its not a complete gamble.
1 Like
Actually one very important change was added this time for Italy, which is already a miracle, F-104S ASA is now 11.7. Although it wouldn’t be Gaijin if they allowed us to have fun in it, so they also sent F-15 to 12.7, but hopefully it would be sucked to its own premium hole more often.
I’m sad that all the feedback on Littorio ships’s got ignored, they are dogshit with 45 s reloading aced compared to others 23-34 s. Though I guess naval balancing team doesn’t exist at all, looking at almost zero changes each time and how naval feedback always gets ignored.
2 Likes
11.7 In ground only. All the italian F-104 should have a lower br in air battle too
Like the Kf-41 should be at a lower br up until the aps, atgm and protection are fixed
Or the otomatic that sit far too high in br
But is gaijin, ofc they don’t care about italy
On paper it sounds good, but in reality, its a gimmick.
Dislike. Period.
No, ASA change is for Air RB.
I think many of you are simply exaggerating.
It won’t be as broken as the Gripen when released.
It won’t be as broken as the F-15E when released.
It won’t be as broken as the Rafale on its context.
It won’t be as broken as the F-5C when it was at the old 10.3.
It will definitely be on the strong end of 12.7, won’t argue on that. But it’ll still get regular uptiers and even if it gets a downtier, its radar is known to be unreliable, even for PD standards, so it won’t be as much of a BVR menace.
God forbid the F-15A gets any glimpse of spotlight ever.
You’re missing the point of my complaint. We just received 14.7 of BR in air, decompression, and Gaijin decides to compress it even MORE 11.7-12.7 BR???
Why the hell do we even ask for decompression on all BR?
We dont need the F-15 going down, we need the 13.0-13.7 going up
7 Likes
I think Gaijin has already served us enough BR changes proving they don’t exactly work on causality: They won’t decompress many BR steps below because they’re adding another step at the top.
I’d invite you to digest the reality that decompressing the top BRs have barely ever triggered a mass scale decompression, but atp I won’t stop you from those mashochist thoughts.
Anyway.
so where giving a fake plane yak 141 R73s but still not giving the MIG-29s who where handcrafted to use said missile for them specifically and actively carried them in service
this literally makes zero sense
@Stona_WT
to be fair they decompressed almost nothing its still beyond cooked we should be seeing 3 times the actual decompression where seeing but where not
That’s weird cause it’s functioning perfectly for me.
Could it be a GPU driver error and/or miscommunication between the GPU and display?
Potentially other issues?
1 Like
What bugs aside from the necessary radar fix have been done for the j10c, its still using wrong radar model and or features, still using wrong engine (gaijin pulling the early late excuse is an awful take when they add rafale f3 as a first thing) its still missing all missile cas, actual pl12s (no pl12s exist ingame just sd10as which have less range than pl12), still no dircm on tgp which would solve its cm issue, still no pl5eii which is far better than pl8b, still awful drag, still missing hmd features and yet the gripen not getting babied again like in every other update is the issue?
3 Likes