just give the G6 an imaginary radar like the falcon
gepards!
Didn’t realise that ad hominems were fair game.
Sorry that the Chieftains feel too powerful for you, would you like me to make bad players play them for you, so you feel they’re balanced?
Falcon’s “Radar” isn’t imaginary, its just not a Radar, its Optical tracking
For gaijin to be adding that, as per their own BRMs they will need to be adding a laser rangefinder to it
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/SXHi6awMTul4
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/SYYKuwQiQf1Q

Actually, in real life, a radar can be installed on the Falcon
btw, Gaijin should take note of adding an APIC-T belt as a replacement.
APDS never existed IRL for the Falcon, but APIC-T did
Based on available data for APIC-T, penetration would be roughly ~95–100 mm RHA @ 0° at point-blank, and around ~40 mm @ 60° at 1000 m,
Just wanted to drop this here:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1ytIRwKfdYCH
So a Falcon without radar and lead indicator, with SAP-I that doesn’t melt everything in an instant at 100m, would be an ideal 7.7 SPAA.
Going by the same rate as MK 103 SAPHEI, the penetration would drop from 53mm to 42mm with the SAP-I shell.
I just want justice! BR is still increasing only for Russian machines and everyone is crying that they are OP and because of that Russian tanks are unplayable. T72A,B,1989, T64A,B,T55AM and others. I don’t have the nerve for it anymore. everything is only based on statistics and rarely played tanks then become strong but I don’t mean chieftains but for example Olifant Mk1 at Br 8.3? seriously? with APFDS 336mm at 8.3Br? how can this play against IS3? this is genocide. there are many tanks that need a Br change. best a completely new system or change to UPTIER + - 0.3 and it’s solved. for example T72B bad armor, great gun, no zoom, no thermal vision, no zoom and no reverse and yet it has the same Br as T72Turms which has zoom and thermal vision! the whole BR system based on statistics is wrong!
The T-72B has significantly better armor then the T72AV to be fair.
Also, Russian vehicles are moving up because they are doing well. Their are plenty that have managed to escape BR changes for a while, just as their are NATO tanks that have moved up and NATO tanks that have managed to escape BR changes.
There are very few things or treatments that are Russia exclusive, and very few treatments that are NATO exclusive. The only ones that come to mind are turret baskets and SAM G-pull, both of which favored Russia . Going on and saying that Russia is only ever treated poorly is wrong and only makes the divide and the call for change against Russia worse.
Finally the T80UD gets what it deserves and goes to 10.7, all the Russian mains are going to complain I’m sure about “MUH THERMALS”
how do you think everyone else feels when Russian tanks like the 2S38 and BMP-T just sit at their BRs despite some fairly obvious statistics pointing towards overperformance.
If you’d been reasonable and not gone and slammed the Chieftains as overpowered i’d ordinarily agree with you. But I now personally think the Olifant Mk.1A is just fine at 8.3. How else are British players meant to counter that undertiered monster of a tank, the T-10M! That thing has far too much armour and a gun far too powerful
(In case it wasn’t obvious, no, the T-10M really isn’t overpowered. The Olifant probably could go up and do alright, but the mobility is probably the thing that stops it.)
No, it’s really not. M111 doesn’t tend to discriminate on who it shoots.
Water is wet (if anyone says it isn’t wet and only provides the sensation of wetness…)
Funny that.
In the same way the Chieftains moved up. They’re not necessarily good tanks, its just people do well in them. Although a substantial number of the Russian tanks that move up are very good for their BR.
To be fair, I never said they were good. I just said they were performing well lol. Huge difference.
They are good tanks, just Gaijin decides to give us them in the worse fits, and against tanks with interesting protection characteristics
Speaking of which, when can we expect the historically accurate LRF for the Mark 5?
troll face
2S38 ok, i am Russia main. But i say: 2S38 have really low Br. this is 11.0-11.3. but BMPT is not strong! he have only APDS. very low gun BUT poorly made body. gaijin made him poorly and he is totally broken but not strong. terminator is really not strong but broken and because gaijin is lazy to fix him he just raises him to a higher Br. this is gaijin’s fault.
depends how gaijin models it if its gonna be good
Wether they Model it as HVAP/APCR (terrible)
Similar to Russian 14.5 mm AP-I (Cermet) (good)
To be honest I can’t really tell if the T-80UD/BE is fine at 11.0 or not.
The T-90A has better turret armour, hull armour (for the most part), 7s reload 3BM60, and LWS… while the T-80UD/BE gets a 6s reload 3BM42 with slightly better gun depression and slightly better vertical guidance speed.
It’s wack that the Turm III is still 8.3, yet the T58 went up in br.
Gaijin
where are the actual changes
Why are both Su-30 premiums STILL 13.3
considering the amount if suggestions on your first br changes post I find this incredibly disappointing
You repeatedly, consistently, without fail keep proving that none of you working on the balancing decisions are competent at what you are supposed to do
Something I really want to see is a livestream (with facecam) of whoever you are playing this game in all the brackets and gamemodes that suffer the most from these balancing issues so we can see how you feel about the cancer you have created
Please,
just actually play your own game for once
how are 28+ posts specifically about the premium Su-30s not enough to prove they are undertiered?
how much more proof do you need?


this plane is on par with the J-11A in performance, both of which are better than literally every other 13.3 plane and even some 13.7s in air RB
How in the hell are you supposed to justify this gaijin
Please give us an actual response instead of silence or copy-paste bs through smin
