Air sim:
All at the same 12.7 BR…”great” job
Meanwhile trash Su-27 and 33 are at 13.3 while F-15J outperforms them in every way.
Oh god that I dream to see this …
i have no clue am not good with pc stuff i have this gpu !
when i use DX 11 vsync works but with DX 12 it does not.
Dont worry, you’ll be patched in 2 years.
When ships have major issues, it take around 1~2 years to be patched
eh. i have six shell-related reports on Hungarian ww2 tanks that have been sitting under the accepted label for 2 years. … i have a feeling that 2026 being all about the DOA infantry mode wont help either.
dont worry it will get fixed in war thunder 2
True i didn’t noticed it.
Still the br is still to high. Is in Tornado/Mig 29 range
lol, that’s a terrible screenshot. You cut off the name of your GPU. But yes, the AMD 90 series is not the issue. Head down to the community technicial support section of the forum for help.
In warthunder 2 can cheaters be IP banned?
Seen a few level 15s as of late who purchased premiums like the T58, and have like a 4.0 KDr…
They clearly were a banned account because that dude was looking at people through walls.
I really hope gaijan realise that they are making the falcon an unrealistic tank by adding a radar that was never fitted to the real PROTOTYPE
and if gaijan really wanna get the round’s correct heres the acutal rounds used when the falcon was going though its fire’ing tests
"Armament 2x Hispano-Suiza 30 mm HSS 831L autocannons
620 rounds made up of HE, HEI-T, APHEI, APIC-T "
“Although never fitted, it was possible to equip the turret with a radar tracking unit.”
all of these was found inside this one encyclopedia that has all the propper sources linked at the bottom of the page
It was fitted and manufactured just removed as it would of driven up the cost too much
The bulge on the falcon it literally for the radar
it was never fitted. Posable to fit one but never fitted
It was fitted then removed
u ever read that entire artical about the falcon???
it never ever once says it was fitted because it was never fitted. Probbly was fitted on something else that never saw the light of day
It was fitted and removed by UKs request as it was too expensive
Im not including tank encyclopaedia
sure u arent confusing me with others ?
my heighest is barely 8.0 researched the bmp1 but not brought it
u say that but if they don’t do something then there gonna get alot of hate, they’ve gotten alot of hate at least, for removing apds when it made the falcon viable, bear in mind anything can kill the falcon it dosent take skill to kill it, and yet they removed the apds cause their fav nation of russian wallet warriors where probably screaming and crying about how good an apaa the falcon was
bud bmpt is one of the worst choices gaijin made to teh game it barely survivles irl combat yet takes complete torture ingame and never dies
how in the devils B-hole can the chieftains move up due to high winrate and the BS wonder wagons can stay at the same BR when their winrates are just as high?
Please consider this image about win rates for the next br changes or for future updates:
Both these situations are caused by the slow rate of fire (40s + when aced) for the american standard ships and the Littorios.
In a DPM focused meta, where you spawn directly facing the enemy team with minimal to no cover, having such a slow reload rate is a massive downside, leading to those ships being not able to be usefull to the team or to be stuck in an endless repair cicle as other ships at the same Br can reach even double your RoF.
We already provided different sources stating those ship classes can reach a faster reload and I propose a 35s threshold to make even possible future additions at least competitive or slightly on par with their couterparts from other TTs.
Please consider this for the sake of balance.
