when is the change of british tech tree line you can spare me 3 days of research
Yeah the one in game is the 2003 model.with the mk1 chassis. Casual gaijin struggling to actually read isn’t anything new
2 Likes
🙏 please buff the BV-138 C-1 🙏
It’s called smekalka. Gaijin does it a lot
3 Likes
never thought i’d see the day
4 Likes
Can you guys ever bring back the removed German tanks in some format that can still reach Gaijin’s standard’s? I researched the entirety of the German tech tree for ground. I feel like a reward for doing such a feat would be the ability to research these removed vehicles. If that’s asking too much, then a yearly event like the Maus should be just fine. I ask you why these vehicles even get buffed or tweaked in the first place because not only can most of us not research them, but we can’t even preview the tanks in the hanger to figure out how to fight them or see their stats, especially if you’re like me and on Xbox. I know these are commonly requested. I plead to you and the whoever makes these choices to bring them back, soon.
4 Likes
Rank III Yes, Br 4.0 not needed, it would be higher than the M24.
3 Likes
[DEV] RDF/LT missing commander camera control
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Kr5ZhkLgk5MT
9 months ago.
[DEV] RDF/LT missing smoke grenades, applique armor and AA MG
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/htmFIwmkYbhr
HSTVL/RDFLT can be operated with one crew member
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/23I7757qOUrZ
RDFLT missing Hunter Killer/Commander view
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/8sOxNv7JJvXq
HSTVL/RDFLT ammo name change
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ebSG9ayXfx1S
HSTVL/RDFLT can use Commander vision without CMDR
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/42jstoiXLA1O
I will continue to post these every single update thread until they’ve been addressed.
5 Likes
It’s kind of crazy that it took almost 3 years to lower the Kugelblitz’s Battle Rating from 7.0
(Ever since it had its full HVAP belt removed, it should never have belonged there in the first place.)
All because the unobtainable Flakpanzer 341/Coelian SPAA counterpart to it received a huge belt buff, making it overperform better than it in literally every single way, all while at a lower BR, for finally someone to notice.
Jeez.
2 Likes
Day 24 Still no fix for laser guided bombs over correcting and making it lose all momentum. WHEN GAIJIN! I swear this fix is gonna be like the Gepard 1A2 with with stinger bug that took 68 server updates and 3 major updates after acknowledgement.
1 Like
Could be moved up in BR like the Flakpanzer 341.
That’s a huge buff and negates one of the biggest downsides of the vehicle.
It was more mobile than other 3.7-4.7 vehicle but now has at least equal gun traverse to the fastest turning turrets.
i like taking the Harry Hopkins to 6.0 to personally hunt them. it works very well
1 Like
two tanks get weight adjustments in this, but the Sholef V1 is still 15 tons heavier than it should be despite the “bug report” being accepted/forwarded to the devs over a year ago! gaijin plz :(
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/McbAXBGPc2MU
I think protection analysis is just less confused but it didn’t actually change anything.
The US 76mm could barely penetrate the turret after the change.
It’s simply a change to the general volumetric plate but not the actual thickness.
1 Like
Still waiting for them to fix the Sea Hawk FGA.6 and Attcker FB 1 arresting hook not working, I mean two of the Main Royal Navy Carier operated Aircraft if their Rank and not capable of trapping back to the deck…
1 Like
Which is also under BRed.
But that buff is huge.
There’s no way it’s staying at 3.7 as the killing power went up massively.
Yo is this the announcement of the CV90120-T? No? Then why take the characteristics of two different tanks and confuse them with each other. Ha-ha
1 Like
the one downfall of the puma now being a lot better does warrant an uptiering. then again the panzer 4 long guns are 3.3 and 3.7 when they should be 4.7 so dont get hopes up
They shouldn’t because high penetration doesn’t make a tank good automatically. Or the M10 would be at least 4.3.
A Pz IV has not a single advantages over a KV-1 except that the Pz IV can penetrate the armor more easily than other medium tanks.
But I rather have a vehicle that doesn’t get a gun pointed at by a KV-1 in the first place.
You are never going to shoot a KV-1 from an advantages position because the KV-1 has basically equal or better mobility.
Unless in a downtier, no vehicle has to fear a Pz IV because they can always shoot first.
So unless you have a 37mm or 40mm that doesn’t one shot, you aren’t going to lose against a Pz IV.
A Pz IV at 4.7 is like asking the Hs 129 B-2 to be 4.0 because it has a 30mm with a lot of range.
While a Puma at 4.3 would be a Yak-3 that basically outperforms everyone, except firepower, but is still going to kill you anyway.
5 Likes
I distinctly remember entire thread about this topic lol.
2 Likes