You used the CV90120-T as a reference which has added armour on the sides and front that warrant the added weight, it is not the same as the variant we have in-game. This is the CV90120-T, notice the added armour?
14 Likes
Did they nerf the tiger2 again
Killed the 341 from the 6.7 lineup for what? If APHE just acted normal it wouldn’t need being uptiered but yeah, great.
2 Likes
Coelian is now placed at the best BR it can. Over 7.0 it will gradually see less heavy tanks that can challenge it
Just remove AP rounds from SPAAs and problem solved, but people will continue to defend their OP auto-cannons until they get put so high they don’t have fun.
1 Like
Can some one tell me what did they do to the tiger2
Is this change good or bad???
It was completely fine before the random, un-needed change.
You mean the dubious APHE that has no evidence of it ever even being fielded by the overperforming Yak-9s?
Absolutely. Never should’ve been implemented in the first place.
1 Like
Its not like it mattered, it could kill almost every heavy from the front anyway
1 Like
what?! Puma going to 4.0 and to 3rd rank, you say?! Germany finally having a 3rd rank scout vehicle, you say?!
…do you know how this word is used?
1 Like
Don’t forget the SPz 12-3 LGS! Killer lineup nowadays!
That was fast, maybe you will tune down overrated planes in NAB, before another BR changes? For more planes diversity in naval gameplay.
In Naval Arcade Battles (NAB), you raised the BRs of modern aircraft in the patch; but forgot reduce the overinflated ones cause of AAB — this will add more variety to naval battles:
(NAB) A2D-1 9.0 > 7.7 (this aircraft isn’t much better than the A-1H, which is at 6.3)
(NAB) Canberra B.Mk.2, Canberra B(I).Mk.6 – from 8.7, 9.0 to 8.3 (BR is overinflated; American Canberras are at 8.3; this change will give British aircraft to a set with Vanguard ship, which lives at 8.0)
(NAB) Ki-84 Hei 7.7 > 6.0, Ki-84 Otsu 6.3 > 5.7, Ki-84 Ko 6.0 > 5.3 – these aircrafts do not have advantages in NAB; their BRs are overinflated for AA capabilities.
(NAB) J2M5, J2M3, G.56 – from 6.7 > 5.7 – same as above
(NAB) J6K1 from 6.3 > 5.7 – same as above
(NAB) Tu-4 from 8.0 > 7.7 – similar to B-29 with comparable payloads that actually live at BR 7.0
2 Likes
Yeah but when Scout UAV for CV 90105 TML like other light tanks at 8.3 and 8.7?
Not sure if moving the flakpanzer up a small bit will really address the issue, as there are tons of soft skinned tanks (Japan, Italy, France, and Leopards) in the new BR range. I guess we’ll see if the BR is any more playable, or if this will just force more heavily armored tanks for a while.
EXCELLENT! My Ground Arcade lineup is very happy now 😁
@GNDM_Panzer ISN’T THIS WONDERFUL NEWS?! 😆
And check out muh 10.3 GRB lineup now 🤣 ALL THE BMP’s+BMD’s 😄 (And 2S38+2S25M, ALL the gud RU lights with Thermal Visions 🔭🌃) AND now this ENTIRE lineup’s ground vehicles can scout!
Check it out! Fixed!
okay, you confused with CV90120 with CV90120-T… so you just nerf it without reading the sources carefully and we don’t have CV90120-T in WT?
11 Likes
id say ever so slightly better for Tiger II P, but not like it would do much lol.
I just happen to have a screen of old Tiger II P turret face protection map agaist US 76mm M61 round
and here is the current protection map against same round
ever so slightly less green. ignore the gree strip on the roof, that area will simply bounce and no one would go for it intentionally.
4 Likes