The Yak-38… you mean the pencil that can only kill you if you screw up?
But with better made armor and the M428 (the one he would actually use) he could have a higher Br, so the initial change that gaijin made would have been correct.
Have you even considered the fact I haven’t researched those trees? xD
Luckily I already have my F-16 spaded, but yeah having Aim-9Ps and SARHs at 13.3 is ridiculous
Its just funny given that pretty much all of it was from 10 days ago, lol, they found like what, 2 things in over 4k comments worth while to add?
Maybe it would help if they would say “suggestion by X person” if they pick one up, or have a list of “this is stuff you guys suggested and we are looking into”.
1 Like
Still, just the idea behind going vs unavoidable stuff is annoying. Stuff can always come out of nowhere due to the spotting system.
It works fine for me (just checked).
Please be sure to verify files (in launcher or steam library, depend on how you launch WT).
If you already did this and that did not helped, please submit valid bug report here: Community Bug Reporting System (with all necessary files, so we can check what cause the issue for you). It’s not a global bug/error but looks like something related to your local files.
What do you define as “worse”?
@MommyDommyEnjyr
Mirage 4000 is one of my favorite jets in the game.
Great example of what 13.0 should be.
There are ~8 - 11 OP 13.0s that should be 13.3, but there are 11 - 14 13.0s that should be 13.0, and 2+ 12.7s that should be 13.0 as well.
That feedback is there and noted for when aircraft perform over the next few months.
And honestly most of the great suggestions that weren’t actioned on this time will likely occur next time when more data substantiates those claims.
Just how it’s been, and we’ll have to keep going.
I also explicitly state when I make edits to my posts with the reasons I edit posts.
It’s sad how people hate on those of us that admit our flaws and mistakes.
I can’t imagine how people can think it’s “disingenuous” to admit when you’ve made mistakes.
I think it was mainly about having that raw penetration power, rather than being increased due to performance.
Gaijin says they balance it based on data, but then you see systemic like changes where they try to put certain level of firepower or armor to a certain baseline.
I wanna hear your opinions lay it on me
2 Likes
Let’s see, really in this case it is a difference in the point of view regarding the game. For example, I prefer that the devs modify the game in depth, correcting the penetration and damage flaws, improving the penetration calculator, reviewing the armor and that each tank uses the bullet it uses in reality, that’s why I want the Merkava 2D to have its real armor and the M428, which due to the production dates is the one it should have, and then put the Br that corresponds to it. Then there are other people who prefer to leave things as they are for whatever decisions, and it is legitimate, we both have the same right when it comes to the game, although of course, the devs surely pay much more attention to the players who ask to leave the game as it is, that way they work less hehe.
Nice gaslighting. No, you don’t. Multiple mods have called you out on it too. Your gaslighting isn’t working anymore. Too many people know how you act now.
I have the receipts if you would like me to post proof of your misdeeds. I doubt you want everyone to see more evidence though. You should stop doubling down on your bad behavior.
8 Likes
This is a joke.
The Obj 435 is still 9.0 and now the 140 is the same BR as the T-62.
Meanwhile the T-55A at 8.3 like: 🤨
4 Likes
It would also be interesting if they were going to change something about the Rooikat 1D, as it takes the same amount of time to reload its 76mm cannon as a 105mm cannon, and the damage of that APDS-FS is quite ridiculous.
Thats cool and all but you yet again didnt answer what I asked… where was the feedback or the so called “data” for SARH only jets to not face Fox3 Jets, Its a good Jet I dont disagree. Try playing it at 14.0 where its simply outclassed by even 13.3s (like the JF17) that have Fox3s because they can simply disengage much earlier while you cannot with a SARH missile that is still fundamentally broken since it was added years ago.
People before these BR changes have asked for SARH and Fox3 Jets to have more decompression, yet all we got was a 0.3 BR increase while the majority of 12.7/13.3 basically stayed untouched and didnt solve the bigger problem, which if you read the BR thread, thats what the majority asked for in regards to Aircraft
I believe its a relic of when rate of fire was way more connected to reality and real life ability as it is actually a bit of a pain to load and fire the Rooikat if you watch videos of the crew inside the turret iirc.
Would be nice for gaijin to either improve its APFSDS ammunition spall or rate of fire.
2 Likes
@MommyDommyEnjyr I’m replying to Warturtle’s post, but you might be interested in my thoughts here as well.
Assuming all* current 13.3s move to 13.7… and so forth. 14.3 can stay for now.
Aircraft that should be 13.3 from 13.0:
Su-33.
Su-27.
J-11.
F-2A ADTW.
Baz.
F-15J.
F-15A.
Aircraft that can be 13.0 or 13.3 depending on sway:
Tornado F3 Late.
J-8F.
F-4F KWS LV.
AV-8B+
AV-8B+
Kfir C10.
Aircraft that should be 13.0:
Mirage 4000.
Mig-29G.
Sea Harrier FA2.
JAS39A.
JA37DI
JA37DI F21.
F-16A.
F-14A IRIAF.
F-14B.
F-18C Early.
F-18C Swiss.
2 Likes
The Object435 is so good… that I don’t even bother bringing it in my 8 vehicle 9.0 USSR lineup, lol. That is to say, they killed it by moving it to 9.0. But the T-62M1 has been there for ages now, so they’re okay with that. Even when deciding what vehicle to put into the lineup now that BMP-3 is gone, it was simply a choice between the AMD or uptiering BMP-2. Object435 was not even a factor.