Nope. I don’t see the stats, don’t know where to see them. As far as I’m concerned that’s a player problem. Because I’ve seen a Yamato wipe a whole team itself, and I myself have been able to, not the same extent, but something similar.
I’m surprised the Iowa is higher than the Yamato tbh. That just doesn’t make sense.
SS has 8.58 K/D ratio for the last month. The second best ship in that regard is Iowa with 6.77 KD. Yamato has 2.02 KD. Roma has 1.94.
SS is clearly overpowerforming, even when compared to Iowa.
Its global statistics for the last month. The SS KD of 8.58 is average, ie. it includes both good and bad players. That makes the SS standing out so much even worse, because clearly, even bad players can perform exceptionally well with it.
Cmon man, use your brain. Either it’s OP, or, clearly it’s the player base.
The Iowa is far closer to the SovetSky than any other ship, and the Iowa was one of the weakest to be added for Leviathans, pretty much being a bigger Alaska.
The most powerful, the Yamato, is far lower and I assure you that’s not the ships fault.
Bismarck players are coming off of playing things like the Scharnhorst which were practically invincible against the things it faced, new Bismarck players I’ve seen play very aggressively, and bring too much ammo.
No, I don’t think it’s a bias problem, in fact I think they are all quite balanced. The SovetSky has practically no spaa, where as the Yamato, and the Iowa are covered in it.
If you really say remove the SovetSky, I’ll agree, because then, the real Russian bias can enter the chat room, we can just get missile cruisers instead and be untouchable 15 miles away while we sink you.
Who says bad players are playing it? Most people are bot farming since it’s usually a 3v3
Statshark allegedly gives you a picture of the player base as a whole, or at least a very big portion of it, given how many battles it’s counting. So, either only exceptional players are clustering to the SS for some reason, or the guy’s right, it’s not the player base. There is no world in which a regular WT vehicle is getting an average 8.5 K/D unless it’s only being played by the best players out there. It’s clearly the kit.
I am soon to get my Iowa, if my stats match or even surpass the stats of my SovetSky, it’s definitely not a ship problem. But I’ll keep your ideas in mind
Lmao. See I used to say stats were reliable, and still do. But the people who didn’t want the fox nerfed, when it was 7.7 and had a crazy turret rotation, showed me that merely assuming that all the vehicles were played by good or bad players if false. It is hard to dictate whom is playing what.
Soyuz is a massive outlier. Probably the worst in the history of WT. If this >8 k/d thing would be German, it wouldn’t have remained unchanged. They would have made a hotfix after 1 week to nerf it…latest! Its russian however, so they leave it sealclub.
Similar to KH-38 in Ground RB. Instead of nerfing this cruise missile, Gajin rather plans to change to whole game mechanic. Like the upcoming spawn point change for fighters and Strike aircraft. All this cause Ru players double spammed KH-38 Suchois. Now everyones air options get nerfed.