2S25M needs to be raised to BR11 and the 2S38 to BR11.7 !
But the Begleit gets moved to Br 9.7. What a bias.
2 Likes
Not exactly: the original mobility nerf was bigger than the one we got in the end, remember. I’m not really sure why that is either.
I just finished spading the Su-33 now, if it goes up to face Rafales and Eurofighters again I’ll never play it, its stressful facing strong Fox-3 slingers when I can only launch one missile at a time through a hard lock and that missile misses easily if my radar is notched or I have to break lock to dodge an Aim-120/MICA coming at me while the plane that launched at me doesn’t need to worry about breaking lock since their missile does the work for them.
Well, the WT playerbase is extremely reactionary to changes that would fix to make vehicles more accurate when it’s a nerf, so someone submitted a bogus report that said the Tiger II’s top speed is 38 km/h @ 2500 RPM because that’s also listed in the driver’s manual on one of the first pages and because of the backlash gaijin agreed even though that’s most definitely just an error because the math doesn’t agree.
1 Like
Whislt the Su-33 probably shouldnt have to face a Typhoon or Rafale. No 12.0 should have to face anything with more than 2x R-27ERs. and the Su-33 has 8 of them, with 4x R-73 to back them up. Even the 13.0 ARH slingers can have a tough time against that.
So its the lesser of the 2 evils, imo, it would be better to mvoe a lot of the 13,0s up to 13.3. But ideally we’d see a new 13.3 bracket created by moving 13.3 and up, up by 0.3. So the status quo remains the same in an uptier for the 13.0s moving up
2 Likes
Tiger II’s gearbox with listed gear ratios and top speeds at those gears
Tiger Ausf. E’s gearbox with listed gear ratios and top speeds at those gears,
The Tiger II is using the speeds for its gears from the Tiger Ausf. E @ 2500 RPM now because they didn’t actually want to make it accurate after the player base cried about it.
3 Likes
While I agree, the Su-33 does suffer a bit in the fact that it uses SARH missiles. So in an uptier its relegated to trying to third party people and ambushing, while in a down tier its a menace but lacks the maneuverability to roll Aim-7Fs(I have the worst time facing these for some reason, I can roll Aim-7Es with ease, but an Aim-7F? That thing comes at me like it’s a MICA.) And you cannot do BVR because nobody at 14.0 is stupid enough to let an Su-33 maintain a hard lock so they can guide their R27ER into their cockpits. The current 14.0s should be 15.0 which can let the Su-33 move up to 13.3 then.
I feel the same with the Tornado F3 Late with AMRAAMs.
Never a tactic i’ve ever relied upon (though i’ve never faced them in anything that can actually do that) but your best bet is just to kill the thing firing an Aim-7F at you with the R-27ER, will easily win in a dual, even if you fire late.
Aim-7F probably feels harder because it has a sustainer, that keeps it at a higher speed for much longer. E2s run out of energy much faster.
You can fire an R-27ER, switch your radar off, letting it guide on IOG and then re-engage the target when it gets closer. Tricky tactic but highly potent from what I understand.
Perhaps… Though assuming a lot of the Fox-3s moved up and not just the 14.0/14.3s… the Su-33 would then probably move higher than 13.3, as there are 12.3s and maybe even 12.7s that shouldnt be fighting F-15As, Gripen As, Su-33s, and Su-27s.
1 Like
Oh good, the Obj.140 becomes even worse 8.7, no laser rangefinder no APFSDS, why use it whe you can use the T-62 for free?
Ahh yes can’t be an update without messing with some reward tanks not needing it… Leopard 2AV goes to 10.3 does it have Laser rangefinder and thermals? i forget… it might have laser rangefinder… and what BR is the normal Leopard 2 10.7? so close. let’s get there next update… and PT_16/T14 mod. to 11.0 but same reason as the Leo 2AV No thermals fighting 11.3 up to 12.0 yeah, yeah it has an autoloader but so does the Turms-T at 10.7 and Turms has thermals. i think the Leo 2AV and the PT-16/T14 mod was fine at 10.0… i don’t see why i’d pick to play the 2AV over the other Leopard 2’s available. speaking of PT-16/T14 mod at 11.0, is there any 11.0 lineup to pair it in?
4 Likes
I was talking about the bmd-4m
No lol. The F-15E is better, it was slightly better before it got aim-120C-5s, now it’s just better all around, other than turning.
Same, but it’s 2 nice sales for the 7 or 8 sales we missed out on, many of which had all the packs on sale.
They are equivalent planes and deserve equal BRs. Aim-120Cs are not that much of an upgrade either, especially since the Su-30SM still has the overall better loadout.
Um no?
There’s a reason the Su-30SM has 14 aams.
The aim-120cs are vastly better, and so are aim-9ms, those things are insane. Especially for sim.
F-15E can catch a fleeing Su-30SM, where as the Su can out turn the F-15E if the F-15E has a brain it will win most times
True, but ARH will win over SARH every time.
You can still utilize most vehicles just fine with that BR.
Why did you edit what I said in the Quote?
You’re willfully being ignorant of existing vehicles like the 2S25, T-64B, and Khrizantema because you dislike the BR change of some OP vehicles.
It would not be hard to build a 9.7 lineup with these vehicles. If you utilize Helicopters and Aircraft, you get an even larger one.
If you think the change from 9.3 to 9.7 broke your entire Soviet Tech Tree at that bracket, you’re seriously ignorant of minor nation BR gaps.
WELL SINCE THESE “CHANGES” HAVE GONE INTO EFFECT I WILL NO LONGER BE SPENDING MONEY TO BUY ANYMORE TANKS/PLANES OR PREMIUM TIME. Hopefully you will fix the things that REALLY need to be changed before doing what was done this time.
The KV-220 is pretty much a joke now at 6.3. It was already anemic at 6.0 trying to fight Jumbo Pershings and King Tigers with BR-365 shells.
1 Like
I didn’t edit what you said lol. I merely emphasized the illogical nonsense.
Acting like 2s25, T-64B, and Kriz are any good is a great joke.
Because it was an illogical change. Why is the Xm246 still 8.3 when it should be an 9.0? Its damage model is so bad it often lives things it really shouldn’t.
Or
The Turm III the undisputed king of 8.3
Or
The T29, the undisputed king of 7.0
Or
The Ho Ri production? (Literally a fake take) at 7.3 and is vastly broken.
Or
France’s Somua? 7.7 for years now!
These are just a few of many many examples in other tech trees.
What aircraft that are actually decent? All the Mi-24s even with all IRCM equipment, get hit by aams constantly, even if flaring & moving.
The helis are trash. And Gepard like spaa have been decimating them for years, and thanks to the heli nerfs, one single .50 cal can force a heli to go back and land.
The planes? Terrible. Please, go ahead, you get fighters and that’s about it, they are all crap strike fighters at this br.
Yes it did rather hurt that bracket. That’s why certain people don’t play certain nations at certain brs, because they don’t like them. The USSR has a very finite amount of “good” brs.
Mainly being
(USSR): 2.7, 5.7, 7.7, 9.3 and 10.3
USA: 3.0, 3.3, 5.3, 5.7, 6.0, 6.7, 7.0, 8.0, 8.3, 8.7, 9.0, 10.3, 10.7, 11.7, 12.0
Germany: 1.3, 2.0, 2.7, 3.3, 3.7, 4.0, 5.0, 5.3, 5.7, 6,0, 6.7, 7.7, 8.0, 8.3, 9.3, 10.0, 10.3, 12.0
Stark difference there, ain’t it?