Are you paying out the nose to play? No, ofc not so they aren’t going to focus changes on lower ranks because they simply aren’t paying the bills.
These changes are underwhelming regardless of tier.
4 Likes
True that, J-7D is a wish.com J-7E - which means it’s still damn good. A-5C is a good grinder, but nothing to write home about. I love the Magic 1, but PL-5B are better.
2 Likes
Its realy great that suggestions like the 2S38 get continously ignored. It is always brought up when asked about br change with the highest number of likes out of the suggestions.
But it continously gets ignored update after update. Why even ask for suggestions when the big reuqested ones get ignored all the time
33 Likes
So you looked at maybe 4 suggestions out of thousands? Typical, don’t know why we all thought it would be different. You ask for feedback and then actively ignore it.
[Edit] For air battles you have legitimately made 4 RB changes and 8 Sim changes, so a whopping total of 12 changes made out of nearly 3k suggestions.
[Edit 2] 12 out of 2939 is 0.44%. You listened to less than half a percent of suggestions. Again why bother asking for feedback if you don’t actually listen to it.
30 Likes
It’s to give you the illusion that your voice matters. Hence why I didn’t even bother suggesting a single BR change.
25 Likes
I don’t get why the swiss Hunter had to be bumped to 10.0, especially in Ground-Realistic.
4 Likes
counter to the us mains
most players don’t want Abrams at 1.0
Why did you lowered the migs br ?
They were performing great at 10.7.
Ground br changes are useless because of compression, just make 12.7 jets to (on grb) 13.0 and move the 12.0 tanks to 12.3
3 Likes
Bevause it makes them a LOT of money, same reason they don’t fix any of the OP prems, T-80UD can go up too
2 Likes
They have people sorting through the crappy and lazy reports and finding the good ones, evidently didn’t happen this time though
The only 2 air RB suggestions you listened to were for premiums, nice
10 Likes
Russian bias+money maker
1 Like
Sorry, my English isn’t very good, but is this for real??
(ARB)
The Su-25BM has R-73 x2 + R-60M x2, previously 11.3, now 11.0.
Why is the AMX A-1A also 11.0, the same as the Su-25BM? Its missiles are terrible, and it only has two of them!
The AV-8B (NA) has 4 AIM-9L but is still 11.3???
The A-7E is slow and only has two AIM-9D or 9G missiles but still 10.7—why?
There are still many vehicles need br change too like :
A-7K, Buccaneer S.1, Buccaneer S.2B, R2Y2 series, Hunter F.1, Hunter F.6
12 Likes
Great. ZERO of the ground vehicle changes we asked for were implemented.
12 Likes
Is my memory got tricked or these changes were supposed to go to Sim and not GRB?
Currently it’s able to beat even the Kfir canard to a base, and still carry 4 good missiles, it can stay 11.3 for now
2 Likes
I don’t think we should rank fighter/interceptors by their ability to bomb bases. The F-104S isn’t good at 11.3 atm.
1 Like
A-5C is up with J-7D for the same reason so no one is safe from br bumps due to bombing ability
BR brain chain: nation popularity → player statistics + ignoring vehicle capabilities → ridiculous BRs
8 Likes