mine:
Need to spade the AH-64A after the event, they change to 12.0 my beloved viper ;(
Why the is the Hunter F.6 still at 9.7? Because of the super maneuverable missiles? Ok but they have a 2 km range. Its a fat hog in the sky with decent top speed for the br.
1 Like
new model. Gaijin significantly weakened the armor while repairing the 99A geometric model.
this not only failed to improve the situation, but also made it worse.
imaginative.
1 Like
You seem to want to try and justify a stupid decision rather than just accepting its a stupid decision.
RIP Sea Vixen
3 Likes
Have no issue with the MTTD getting DM33 and moving to 9.3…my issue is moving the 105 to 9.7 for no apparent reason.
1 Like
Dont get this, Britains 10.0 lineup went up to 10.3 and their 10.3 lineup is now 10.7, both are arguable GBs strongest BR lineups…
I suggest keeping it clean in here, a couple of messages have already been removed as you guys can see, please avoid unnecessary and tasteless comments.
2 Likes
The other nations 10.0 are still there.
The Soviets are my most played yet I play multiple other nations, I’m really looking forward to playing both Sweden and Germany at 9.3 now due to the changes
I disagree. When it’s more than one person making the same suggestion, for the nth time, for x amount of months/years with little to no response; being frustrated/negative about it is fair game.
The general consensus here seems overall negative. People are clearly not happy and yet there’s next to zero “Hey, we hear your frustration over these. Let’s us go back to the devs and get more information on some of these changes to better explain why X happened and not Y or perhaps Z”. At this point, I’d prefer to see them reversed until then.
3 Likes
Wait you telling me Devs read and decided on 3k suggestion in just 4 days?
Yeah good to know you think we are literally stupid, appriciate it.
@Stona_WT Please enlighten me why is this post flagged? Like whats here against anything Im just stating the facts…Like this type of censore is redicilous…
4 Likes
Yes, but russian are the most played for “obvious reasons” .
Is a wasted of time. Basically is full tupier + defeat over and over again.
Keep playing russians and enjoy.
1 Like
Quite literally read people say: “I’ll die before the game becomes playable”
At least, in my humble opinion, this is too much. And I haven’t said that you CAN’T be negative about it.
In any case, feel free to disagree.
1 Like
Even in a full uptier, the worst you can see is 4x 10.3 lineups for russians, and only if they don’t have other nation’s 10.3 players in their team. That is alot better than a before the patch, where you could see a whole bunch of 10.0 russians coupled with up to 4x 10.3 russians (T-80B, Moderna, Obj 292, all much more scary than a TURMS).
The situation has vastly improved for 9.3.
1 Like
You can’t be more in the truth…
Have you ever thought that it might be a bad suggestion? Just repeating a bad suggestion over and over doesn’t mean it’ll be added eventually. And a couple people asking for a thing don’t represent the community at large.
Because people are actively trying to be unhappy. Alot of the posts here, especially in the news threads, are very nitpicky. You can have a patch with 99 good things and 1 slightly bad one and there will be a few dozen people CRYING about it on here.
Plus, don’t forget, generally more people are inclined to hop onto the forums to express their frustrations than people who are willing to hop onto the forums to just say “good job guys I like most of this patch”. That inherently leads to a feeling of negativity.
No they are not, this is just bad maybe the worst BR change…
Also last update was FLOP, full of bugs and nothing interesting
When they do good job people always give them recognition for it…this time this aint good thats why negative comments…Like are we allowed to express urselves or we can do that only if we have something nice to say???
6 Likes
We need a seperate BR range for Fox3 slingers, they all need to go up.
There are planes fighting top top tier, which don’t even have radar or IRCCM missiles, like the Netz.
F16 can’t go further down, because they would absolutely dominate everyting, so we need more decompression already, it’s pure pain.
The Soviet ex-10.0 now 10.3 is the most played because it’s the most fleshed out, 10.0 was a weird spot because things like the T-72B’s are objectively worse than the T-80B, 2A4, Abrams so where do they go in BR?
Then things like the 2S38 and BMP-2M are kept down by their player performance. Both the 2S38 and 2M should probably be 10.7.
Why is it a bad decision? What about it is bad? Is there an alternative that addresses the point that keeps getting brought back up? Whether it’s good or bad, if it’s something that finds its way into every discussion on an overall system, it is on the devs and community managers to address it. Not just ignore it. Especially in instances where you ask for feedback on an action that may affect it.
When you repeatedly bring something up that is ignored, that’s not nitpicking for no reason. Your comment seems to defend this idea that community managers don’t have to do their job and engage with player concerns and frustrations. Thats a major part of their role. And forums are means for players to voice that frustration. If you’re happy with the game; then there’s really no reason to be here.