They’d be waaaay better if they moved them to 11.0/11.3 and removed their Magic 2s. Well except maybe the F1CT since that one is “supposed” to be a modernized model
2 Likes
The Rooikat 105 being moved to 9.7 from 9.3 because it has a machine gun compared to the MTTD is pathetic and stupid. Britain doesnt have ANY other ground vehicles at 9.7, you literally have 2/3 planes. What is the point in this? Where is the logic in this? Its infuriating that you give Britain half baked vehicles at ridiculous BRs.
The Stormer AD at 10 means england STILL has no decent AA going into 9.3 onwards. Its just becoming a joke at this point tbh.
22 Likes
nice amx a-1a ghibli still 11.3 arb… slow, 2 missile 45g not have irccm easy to flare,cant bomb base because other fast jet will bomb base, and suffer :) thanks
16 Likes
Smoke grenades are not a machine gun.
Rooikat 105 is objectively superior to Rooikat MTTD.
As for the BR changes; I’m more satisfied than dissatisfied. There’s a number of things to be dissatisfied of course.
2 Likes
Another round of rushed br changes that ignore most of the feedback given.
Congratulation Gaijin
43 Likes
Also typical gaijin to focus majorly on cold war/modern era while only tweaking a few WW2 era vehicles (for the worst) italian and Japanese planes are horridly overtiered and people have complained about that for years, but gaijin doesn’t care.
10 Likes
Somehow Merkava 4s are now the same BR as a 2A7V. WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE!
12 Likes
You don’t know feedback was ignored.
Inaction =/= ignored.
Always have been.
1 Like
You know, now they reload faster.
That makes it balanced for them to be the same BR as faster and smaller tanks with twice and thrice the armor effectiveness and coated in spall liners, even though they are the size of a skyscraper while having an armor incapable of withstanding any kinetic threat anywhere on the vehicles.
That being said, Arietes are just 0.3 BRs below, so heh.
Compression at Top Tier is so extreme, and this BR update did nothing to address it. The 0.3 “decompression” (lol) only affected the 9.0 range. Nothing changed for 10.7+.
5 Likes
The Type 69IIa need to get the APFSDS and needs to go to 8.7 (rank6) aswell
Can you fix this issue? The hit box of the 99A turret has a vulnerability. All relevant reports were rejected without any reason.
turret NERA here has a thickness of approximately 650mm. But in the game, there is only 360mmKE here. And it also includes ERA calculation. If we remove the 250mmKE caused by ERA. Only 100mm remains.
650mm only 100KE? This is absurd.
please help me.
4 Likes
Please stop making things up. CMs checked +3000 posts and pass feedback to dev team. Fact, that not all changes you liked were implemented doesn’t mean we ignored it.
21 Likes
Ignore: refuse to take notice of or acknowledge; disregard intentionally.
I have replied to your post, i haven’t ignored you,
if I hadn’t answered you I would have ignored you
Gaijin have Indeed ignored anything we have said to them
8 Likes
AH-64DJP are unplayable now😭
3 Likes
If you guys spot bugs of any sorts the forums are NOT the place to post this, and neither the place to ASK for the bug, if there is one, to be fixed.
Please use the War Thunder Bug Reporting Site instead.
1 Like
Challenger 2 is larger than Merkava Mk4.
Compression is not “extreme”, either. At most 0.3 is not extreme. Combat is more about the 4th onion layer that is armor.
Ammo, mobility, reload, observation equipment, etc.
Skipping straight to onion layer 4 helps no one.
If I did that, my ground performance would be far worse than the 2:1 KDR average.
Nice let’s increase the Br of the 2pl and not give it a Dm53…
4 Likes
as someone who understands the situation. you’re joking?
5 Likes
You expect to answer +3000 posts, one after another? If you expect to have bots here, answering you just to make you feel better, well, sorry, this is not the place you are looking fore. I really hope that I simply misunderstand you, because what you are saying is simply super strange and unreal.
3 Likes
Indeed. Them being ignored would imply lack of knowledge of these.
However, when I’ve asked @Smin1080p_WT about many of the suggested changes that were not applied, he was able to reply to me instantly with an answer from the developers (he’s the GOAT for always taking his time to reply quickly), which proves that, as much as I disagree with the logic (or lack of thereof) of the answers provided, these changes weren’t applied not because they were ignored, but because they were straight out rejected. Which I am not sure whether it makes it better or worse… but it certainly can’t be said that they were ignored.
For example, the answer regarding my M1A1 AIM concern;
If anything, you could argue that they ignore the underlying issues the suggestions are attempting to solve, but that’s not exactly flat out ignoring the suggestions themselves.
In any case, CMs did their job as best as they could, and remember- they are not to be blamed for the developers’ decisions. CMs are just the messengers.
26 Likes