Update 2.37.0.84

i got instead of 5k rp bombing a base now 3k so Gaijin secretly decreased the rp by 40% hopefully they decrease the rp for researching by 40%. Or they only make vehicles as a microtransaction and not obtainable in researching so nobody needs any rp

3 Likes

what is blud yapping about

1 Like

you rigth in that …I’m lack of good stats on that acft, that not mean I don’t how to play, …What I Said in spanish , all one of us need to learn full the vehicle you using , does not mean if you have low K/D on that ACFT, you dont know how to to use it…if you see I gave a lot of ACFT in my record…only need to improve how to fly it…cause gaijin change everything from time to time…thats I was triying to explain

“know how to play” and have below 1 KD is contradicting

If you said so…ok

I find Gaijin’s practices quite funny, not to say sad: they raise the br of planes like the J35XS, F4C, F5C because people are using it to rocket bases and artificially boosting their stats (we can argue about the f5c in this one but why would you play it over the F5E when they are in the same br?). Now they “”“”““bugfix””“”“” the base rewards do the ground.

Does anyone here believes that they will reduce the br of these planes again? I sure as hell dont.

I dont think a company as big as Gaijin will actually make these kind of changes without planning, meaning they consciously had a sale, upped the br of some planes and now reduce base rewards.

Just one more thing: they cite a 5 year old post, that if you go to the comments the majority of players disagree with the changes, and a 7 months old bug report. Meanwhile there this one about the rp simply disappears that is 3 years old and there is not a fix yet. But hey, anything to make the grind more miserable right Gaijin?

11 Likes

Buying the J35XS Saab was a mistake on my behalf, i wan’t my damn money back. @Stona_WT

4 Likes

image

image

What I see your stats don’t differs from mine too much, in any case…nice to meet you

What I can see you have a really good experience on SB…in this case I prefer SIM on DCS

.> thunderskill

2 Likes

Maybe with the changes to the rewards for destroying a base, we will return their short respawn time?

4 Likes

Still hoping for an explanation as to why the Tornado WTD61 and IDS-MFG are 11.3, and the Tornado IDS-ASSTA1, GR.1, and IDS-1995 are 11.7. They are the exact same, same engines, same air to air performance… everything, but because the tech tree tornados have guided air to ground weapons, they are a higher BR… in fact theyre a higher BR than they are in ground RB… why? are laser guided bombs really that much of an advantage in air RB?

3 Likes

F-4EJ ADTW is cooked

u know what’s crazier?
Su-25BM is 1.0 higher than Su-25SM3 despite being worse (lack of R-60M)

2 Likes

the entire implementation of seperate BRs for ground and air seems to have done absolutely nothing to actually make strike aircraft better balanced

1 Like

“I don’t understand why people are celebrating. Clearly, they did this to make the game harder to farm, using the excuse that it was a correction. Luckily, I’ve already researched everything, but this makes events even more challenging.”

5 Likes

Finally no F-4‘s taking 2 bases! Thanks Gaijin! Its a pleasure to play the Tornado now!

2 Likes

Does anybody here actually use the su22m4 for CAS I was so excited to see it at 10.3 because it would be decent ground pounder with ordinate capable of hitting Sam’s before having to get within there range which would most likely kill you, definitely a bug I’m not glad was “fixed”

1 Like

In the process of fixing bugs it has led to a nerf. Whether accidental or intentional something needs to be done to level the scale again. As things are, it’s not ideal.

2 Likes

If people didn’t abuse the rocket exploit then it wouldn’t be as high in BR in the first place. But it still works fine where it is as a fighter.

the event vehicle is a boat, so mission points in air battles are entirely unrelated.