Your stats are subpar with every vehicle you play
Lmao. What? Proving my point you say baseless things with no value but slander
What do you mean, my stats are 68% arcade 66% RB. Im pretty good if you ask me. But devolving to personal attacks and dissection proves you have nothing but evil interest and a disingenuous polarized view of a certain group of people
Starting to think they’re a bot. Like there’s no actual substance to their statements and they keep repeating that. Best to just block ‘em. That feature has been a blessing lately.
oh sure my bad, how silly of me
/s
thats what a new top tier premium does. dont worry. next year we will get premiums for sweden and germany to lower winrates again…
Haha. Different tanks have different layouts. An ace abrams gunner Stationary can slam a cold one home in 3s. 4s-4.5s would be fair by game standards for the “average ace”. 5s is pretty average good for a loader, but the game still calls that Ace. 7s is qualifying, i.e you suck and are a new loader.
But its fair given the game, so ill take it. Were not being greedy asking to meet in the middle for the sake of fairness because its still a videogame. Im very happy settling at 5s
6sec doesnt even qualify you as a loader in most army… hence why 5 sec for all nato tanks with 120mm should be standard in the game.
what gaijin also is not modeling is that when you move, your reload should be slower, when you are stationary, your reload should be faster. its all simplified to a point where they took the average of the worst on the move and a good reload time stationary and made that the reload time ingame. kinda sucks ngl
oh and as soon as you are missing loader+commander you are screwed
The click bait and AIM are def effecting win rates.
Oh? Just like the PSO, 80UK, 80UK, BMP2M, TURMS, bishma, 2a5, OES, and every other squadron and premium at every other BR too??
yeah… but the others dont get premium bonus… also Clickbait is the new kid on the block… soooooo
I agree. I mean, its just not a feature. I have brainstormed an idea where reloads are 6-12s on the move depending on the tanks speed and loader level/ace for manual loaders, and 3-6s Stationary from ace-stock
But this is also the door opening to major western tank fixes, every western tank has numerous acknowledged reports, and other fixes have already been applied or are being looked at. This should be a celebration, not jealousy.
Heres hoping its just the beginning
Also, there is fear this just a pad because theyre going to eff us on the armor
Except all the premiums I mentioned? The clickbait JUST came out, this isnt a new issue.
Thank you, as always! o7
How is this being buffed into heaven? You have to ACE your crew just to get a 5 second reload.
Or maybe each player should simply bother about having the underperforming vehicles of their interest improved, instead of complaining that other vehicles that aren’t the ones they want are getting improvements.
It is obvious that improvements to one vehicle hurts other vehicles in the same BR range. Abrams is not underperforming at all, in fact, it is a very strong tank compared to Ariete, ZTZ99A, Leclerc, Merkava, etc. The improvements are both unrealistic and unnecessary. Why should huge improvements be given to the nation with the most complainers when there are neglected bug reports of other nations that could improve MBTs that actually need such improvements?
You try to paint everybody else as childish and emotional, but you are the one with these properties.
Yeah, they have all affected win rates in the past.
Go join a top tier US match and see how many are AIMs and Click baits(almost always one death leavers)
Probably because it always happens with the US so often.
Everytime something non US gets fixed or buffed they lose their minds.
In a thread on Reddit someone mentioned the 2a7 and fixes for the French and some IS players started saying that they don’t need historical fixes.
“The underperforming tank is strong compared to tanks that are underperforming by even higher degrees”…? (At least on Leclerc and Merkava’s case).
Seriously. We got SEPv2, U.S’ main MBT on the present day, with the same hull armor as the first M1 production variant and same turret armor as an early 1990s export M1A2 trial variant. IT IS underperforming, even if “it’s still better than tanks that are underperforming even more”.
Yeah, and I’ve been supportive of a fix ever since the first dev server. I even issued bug reports about it.
Then again;
2A7V underperforming: 650mm KE
SEPv2 underperforming: 370mm KE
And when fixed, it should be:
2A7V: 750 (at least)
SEPv2: 580-600 (optimistic), 540 (most likely)