RB mouse aim until my joystick comes in.
that might be it, you get A LOT more G-forces with full real controls.
1 Like
It’s starting to be less about you guys blatantly nerfing every nation to be worse than the US and Russia, and more about you guys trying to hide or deny it. There are at least 3 reports out that give clear proof from several reliable sources that the Gripen should be able to pull 18 G’s in-game (12*1.5; see reports for more information) yet you close all these down with inadequate reason but you are happy to nerf it further because of a report which has several contradicting sources, written by a Russia main who could not handle having more competition than the US.
Bug report that led to the nerfing of the JAS 39 A/C:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/YKhI5oNKuwKG
Bug reports presenting why the Gripen should be able to pull 18 G’s:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/picmqspxAv7r
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/futaHy1c9KLf
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/FnUyt6PWG6oc
(All these reports were closed for the reasoning “The plane can not actually handle 12 G’s, it was only the FBW that let the pilot pull 12 G’s” (and I assume you understand how dumb this is, that a jet would for some reason be able to pull 12 G’s but break when doing so)
Edit: here is a new report I have made, trying to either fix this issue or get a valid reason for these decisions out of Gaijin developers:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/v1EnoGPsWerd
3 Likes
A cynical person would point to this as “the spall liner isn’t godly enough by contrast so we’ve fixed that.”
1 Like
Maybe in the air?
but on the ground it’s the Russia show. 2008 Abrams still using 1980 hull.
1 Like
When T-14 Armata added as premium.
@Smin1080p we are tired of this situation
When it takes so little effort to nerf anything, just because someone died from it(if its not soviet vehicle you know), while we take so many attempts, to buff(mostly ITS FIX TO REALISTIC VALUES) something either.
And we just cant make any changes in game, with all proofs of the world.
You, communuty managers, should also take responsibility for this, because i dont see interest from you in these questions.
All forum begs about Abrams, Leo2A7V. Lots of really good bug reports are made about new and old bugs that is critical for game balance
But you just ignore it, because YOU CANT allow yourself to make something really good, if its not russian vehicle.
6 Likes
Those Drop tanks are 600L,… not 500 or 800
Also the KFIR Drop tanks are similar to Mirage 5F not Mirage 4000
What happened to the penetration parameters ??? Everything what was okay yesterday is now gone. A 560mm on 11,7 goes through nothing through anymore. It is even hard to destroy a barrel with it.
And another point is if you switch from binoculars mode to aiming mode, the gun almost always/ rise drops. Why is that? This is complete rubbish and has worked normally in the past.
This can only mean that the binoculars have a different fixed point than the gunner and instantly the gun rise/drops. Miracle, then you can also remove the function directly again.
I am really frustrated the with each bug fix new bugs and issue are there. That can only that the test management is doing no regression test or just take it into consideration.
if Armata will come, then the new Panther KF51 is also a must !!! Besides it is nearlly nothing known about Armata and only Prototyp of it exist. There is more information about KF51 than T-14
From what I always knew the 1.5x for G limit is because 99% of the time aircraft are built to be able to sustain 1.5 times their rated maximum load.
So it’s not a simple “take maximum allowed load, multiply by 1.5” but instead the one we have in war thunder is the actual maximum structural limit of the aircraft.
Hello
We are listening to the concerns of the community and posting regular developer updates on the most discussed items. The most recent was last week: Responding to issues regarding dev server reports 13.12.2023
We hope to have more news coming this week covering several of the topics you mentioned that will respond to the concerns around those vehicles from the developers.
We are certainly not ignoring anyone’s concerns, simply these are complex matters that require proper time and evaluation before a developer response can be given as they are all working on the current update feedback.
6 Likes
Considering it took only a few days for maybe 5 players who’s job this is not to interpret armor information to figure it out
Vs:
Gaijin who is an entire game dev, who’s whole focus and job daily is to analyze this stuff, and has significantly more time and people to do it, who also isnt shocked by this not new information it has always had access too
The only delay we’re getting is because they need to find a way to either shoot down the info as false, backpeddling from their previous statement on modern armor or construe it in a way that wont make “US OP” in comparison to russia (i.e, not better)
4 Likes
This week ? well at least good to have a date written on it now i geuss
1 Like
This is verifiably false.
1 Like
Very much looking forward to this.
1 Like
… no plane in this game doesnt lose speed in turns.
I don’t understand how this is a reason to give all aircraft except the Gripen 1.5 times their max G limit
Fair. Its likely a revolving gimp.
The F16 was G locked at 9Gs forever remember?
Please explain in this blog why several reports regarding the G-limit for the JAS 39 A and C have been discarded without being read by the moderators or developers.