what is this comment here? Is this another cope post about some “russian bias” i’m not getting?
What can you call Russian spaa’s maximum g overload fixed while NATO Roland’s and Stingers are getting middle finger? I won’t even bother to argue whether this is soviet bias or some other nonsense, but what Gaijin did here is disappointing and angering beyond words
lmao ok
Content to see my bug report on the T20 finally being fixed and seeing the T20 finally get its torque converter emulated.
Can’t wait to test out the new mobility.
ok noone cares
maybe stop crying and join them if they’re so clearly getting most love from gaijjn
If you don’t care, don’t reply.
.
2s6 was obviously worse than roland with its missiles, from an absolute god of a spaa to just some fly swatter that barely works
now its finally usable again
“Additional sources” are hidden from normal view, only the poster and mods can see it
I see, snail could make the sources visible after validation so we would see them too. But let’s just wonder what kind of sources were provided 🤔
We don’t deserve to see it
@Stona_WT I think the reporter should be required to put the title of their source in the report, so it can be verified and possibly refuted.
And when are they going to improve the precision of the 90mm cockerill cannon? Because it has horrendous precision even at 400 meters.
They should disclose the sources; it makes it seem untrustworthy like this.
Why to hide it anyway ? Anything used in WT needs to be declassified, right ?
Anyhow this change puts on paper the 2S6 on the ADATS level.
@Stona_WT
There might be an error, could you confirm that the AIM-9L was impacted by the changes to the proximity fuse of the Sidewinders as they are not mentioned in the It’s Fixed article
Don’t see any mention of it going to 11.7 or atlest 11.3
Yeah, I’m not sure why they’ve done it like that.
Would make it a lot more convienent for everyone to see files uploaded at “Additional files for historical issues”.
is their any updates or rework coming for volumetric?
There are several considerations, also including legal reasons why we can’t.
Not to mention many people visit archives, purchase books and sources themselves and do not wish for everyone and anyone to just download them freely without consent or permission.
Based on the following sources:
“Техника и оружие”, issue 5, 1996
“Современные амоходные зенитные установки”, by S.Ganin, A.Karpenko
“История создания и развития вооружения и военной техники ПВО сухопутных войски России”, Part 2, by S. Petukhov, I. Shestov
Historical sources attached to reports are not visible to other users. Only the original poster and staff can see them.