United Korea Ground Forces Tech Tree

I like the new structure better. It is more faithful to its in-game role, just like other existing trees in the game.

Although the KW2 Jupiter is a mock-up, it might be considered a ‘partially built prototype’ based on its loading mechanism. It is difficult to say for sure yet, so I need to look for more information.

Eritrean Ch’onma is a bit disappointing. I was expecting the 14.5mm coaxial laser beam…

3 Likes

This tree really doesn’t need to exist. Combining NK & SK, nations with completely different alliances, is a bad idea just like how they bunched ROC and PRC together. They would never fight together in any realistic scenario.

One side doesn’t really have access to the internet

5 Likes

None of the matchups would (have fought) fight together in any realistic scenario either.
That sort of stuff was thrown out of tge window long ago

6 Likes

I don’t hear any north Koreans complaining, & south Koreans, as far as I can tell, are pretty much all in favour.

10 Likes

Probably only the Supreme Leader can complain, I assume he has internet connection XD

6 Likes

Can’t wait for the one steam user in north korea to have a take about this.

10 Likes

Yeah XD 🤣

1 Like

Just because someone loo’d on the front mat doesn’t mean you have to burn the whole house down. Otherwise arcade would be the only gamemode right now. You have no idea if what you’re saying is true when Hungary was added to Italy for being an axis/EU nation.
Sim also exist and the eastern bloc has only 2 nations. Somehow ROC is included in that instead of better options like North Korea or Vietnam.
If you look at it longer than a second, a united korea tree makes no sense.

Realism is long gone. You should accept the reality.
United Korea tree very much makes sense and welcomed by a lot of peoples, and even Gaijin confirmed it. Keep denying it anyway if you want.

16 Likes

US with Islamic Iranian F-14
East and West Germany combined
PRC and ROC combined

1 Like

Realism being gone in the sense of historical nation match-ups doesn’t mean realism is gone elsewhere (and despite all the criticisms, most vehicles are indeed as historical as they can get in a half-realistic, half-arcadey video game like Warthunder).

There’s no point rejecting a United Korean tree on those grounds when we have countless examples of other nations breaking those rules (as you mentioned, PRC + ROC, or BRD + DDR). You may not like them, and that’s fair, but it is the precedent that’s been set.

But above all else it doesn’t matter, now that Gaijin has confirmed their plans for a United Korean tree. It is (most likely) coming. We should be spend time trying to make it as unique as possible, which is my goal with this suggestion, not rejecting it as a concept entirely.

4 Likes

It’s not a precedent, Gaijin isn’t really consistent on what they do, but yes, it’s unfortunately likely they’re going with a united tree. Even though they are at literal war.

And now we wait…

🤔🤔🤔

1 Like

Is it supossed to be blury?

image

Intentional, you’ve got to wait until it’s approved :)

Man, hope you get lucky and it gets approved soon, really looking forward to it
I submitted a suggestion for the chinese type 928D patrol boat which is still pending approval since september lol

2 Likes

I’ve got 16 others pending, some since October… Since it’s a full tree as well, it’ll probably take longer. So, mid-2026? ;)

3 Likes

Small update!

Version 2.1, 08/01/26
New Vehicles:

  • [KP] Ch’ŏnma (late) — BR 8.7. Foldered with Ch’ŏnma (early).
  • [KP] T-55 (1958) — BR 8.3.

Renamed Vehicles:

  • [KP] 1968 Heavy Tank → 68
  • [KP] Ch’ŏnma → Ch’ŏnma (early)

Moved Vehicles:

  • [KP] 68: BR 8.3 → 8.0, foldered with T-54 (1951)
7 Likes

KJU recently toured the factory where the NLOS missiles (designation still unknown) are being produced. The KCNA article just refers to them as “tactical guided weapons” (전술유도무기). These are the missiles on the ‘M2018’ and ‘M2024’ ATGM carriers (and a few other vehicles I haven’t made suggestions for (yet))

G9xgpyYbYAAOBJ4
G9xgpsrasAMGqZt
G9xgpxzb0AAaUoJ
G9xgpwnbAAA9sWh
G9xht2masAMHOg8

7 Likes