You’re right about SA, I’ve fixed that now, and for the Commonwealth Realm v Commonwealth Nation, the comment I replied to just said ‘commonwealth’, so it could be either.
1 Like
Sometimes it’s better not to be associated with me lol.
I’ll just touch on a couple there.
The AMV35 is in the suggestion. While the Sentinel II was made by a foreign nation and not trialed by Australia so we don’t have any claim to it.
AELT has no known finalized design, it’d be difficult to include it in any suggestion.
The Perentie could probably be added, I think we found out about that after this suggestion was already submitted, it’s been a long time in pending.
I actually thought the LAV EOS turret was in there but I can’t see it now.
M60A1 and M551 are very optional, only really needed if they could fill a BR gap since they are copy paste trial vehicles. I don’t think the suggestion needs to include every possible thing.
Even if we had photos of an M113 with the Slinger, it’d be superfluous to the Hawkei Slinger which is an actual in service vehicle with the Australian Army.
1 Like
Fair enough but still it would be better as tech tree vehicle in my book.
Honestly locking unique vehicles behind events all the time getting exhausted and time consuming.
If it becomes tech tree vehicle we shouldn’t have any concern in that regard.
1 Like
+1 great idea
2 Likes
they should move the south african line here too to make it brittain vs colonies
-1
I don’t understand why a new tech tree is needed if interesting tanks begin and end with Ram modifications
I think it would be better to add a few more Ram variants and a couple more Leopard variants to the British tech tree.
I think it’s probably because there is a hell of a lot more there than just a few more Rams. I can’t be sure, but I think that’s the reason.
3 Likes
Сtrl + C, Ctrl + V
As I said on the CANZ air tree, Gaijin in all its wisdom could still screw it up still but hopefully not. Its got at least 1 sherman and domestic tanks and top teir premium so it does fit gaijins TT idea. I personally would like the Matilda II MK IV CS and Land Rover Perentie APS-30 but its not necessary right now.
2 Likes
There’s nothing interesting there
Two tank lines, starting with rank 5, consist entirely of vehicles exported from the US, UK, and Germany
line of light vehicles consisting of a APCs with a bushmaster… I think there’s no need for comment here.
You’re entitled to your opinion. In the same way I’d be totally fine with not a single other Russian vehicle ever being added to the bloated Russian tree. I would MUCH rather play this CANZAC tree.
1 Like
+1 would be very nice to see all these nations vehicles get a proper home and free up space for other UK vehicles
1 Like
Since Gaijin like adding C&P premium tanks, I have and idea for one. The only “action” the A.C. i series of tank had was in the film Rats of Tobruk, where I believe they had small modifications on them, e.g. a larger fake commanders cupola and a few bit here and there. While it wouldn’t change gameplay, maybe someone could get fooled by the fake cupola, it was the only but limited “action” it saw. maybe it could be a skin but it would give gaijin money.
2 Likes
If it were modelled as any of the sixteen tanks that appeared on film, the fake mantlet stuck to the turret front would restrict elevation and depression to maybe +/- 2-4 degrees at most? That really will mess with gameplay. Also I really suspect Gaijin don’t want the tank’s film markings to be in game, even if they are the wrong way around. Although luckily, not all of the tanks were painted with those markings.
Yeah it was just an idea, because gaijin likes money.