Ultimate British Air Tree: A Project to improve the UK Tech Tree (V3.1 OUT NOW!)

[HolmanTheHorror]

@lxtav

With all due respect, you have missed my main point, which i will stare again once more:

THIS IS NOT A WISHLIST, IT IS A COMPLETE TREE INCLUDING EVERYTHING BRITAIN (AND SOUTH AFRICAN SUBTREE) USED

This (again,I feel like a broken record here) is just a metric of what could be added, not what will or should be added.

Neat. It’s also a suggestion that only isn’t because not all of the aircraft have suggestions on the forums. So I’m going to criticize it when I feel there is something to criticize.

So unless I’m being delusional, and the OP hasn’t said…

@lxtav

Hello! and welcome to the most ambitious British suggestion in War Thunder History, the Ultimate British Air Tree!

@lxtav

Please note this was originally intended as a suggestion, however until we can provide more details on each vehicles we have decided it best to post here instead, we will try to transfer it to suggestions as soon as possible

I’m going to treat it as a suggestion, not a wishlist.

@lxtav

You also completely ignored my point about the aircraft being heavily modified, tell me, were any of your P-40s modified to carry 6 250 lb bombs?

If you really want my response to modified P-40s? I don’t know. I don’t have an encyclopedic knowledge of aircraft, far from it, but I honestly doubt Britain would be the only ones to do such mods. It could very well lead back to the original issue of copy paste where a ton of aircraft are suddenly found across multiple different trees, and all because such aircraft were converted to carry indigenous bombs or bigger bomb loads. Which, if it’s only a handful of such craft across all trees, is one thing, would be fine, but if it’s not, would be an issue.

@lxtav

Again with due respect, these are nothing alike, captured vehicles are already a major part of war thunder, as premium but almost every aircraft I have added as researchable has been a frontline combat aircrsft used in large numbers, not a random Mig-29 or F-16 captured/purchased for evaluation reasons

Well, first of all, you have suggested aircraft only ever evaluated into the tech tree, the A-26/Invader.

Secondly, I wasn’t talking about the researchable craft, mostly (see A-26). It was mostly in reference to the premium/event part of the tree. Stuff like the Zero, P-59A, BF-109s, so on, as well as all ‘possible inclusions’ if we were to apply such logic for implementations consistently to every possible addition.

@lxtav

My man, if you think gaijin is getting anywhere near adding this many vehicles to the game in the near future, think again. This has more than doubled the size of the current UK tree, even if we doubled the current amount of additions per update, we wouldnt even come close in 10 years, and I can assure you, i dont think War Thunder will last long enough to have everything here in game.

As stated before, I’m treating this as a suggestion, even if it technically isn’t, as everything in the OP indicates every intent for this to be a suggestion, if not now, then at some point.

[Sea_Harrier_FRS1]

Treat it as the thing that you want badly and need to be kind to the other people that also want to have the same thing that we can all get if we behave

[OliverXRed]

@lxtav

Mosquitos that the US used

What Mosquitos that would be viable did the US use? Genuinely curious.

From the little amount i have looked into Mosquito in USAAF, i only really found info on them using it in the Photo-Reconnaissance role. (US ordered F-8, and PR XVI)

[Nostalgistic]

@OliverXRed

What Mosquitos that would be viable did the US use? Genuinely curious.

I can provide a definitive answer: the Mosquito NF.XXX night fighter variant. Realistically, this is the only viable Mosquito addition for the US tech tree could have in War Thunder.

Historically, the 416th Night Fighter Squadron of the US Army 12th Air Force in Italy had operated NF.30s for their intended night-fighter role from November 1944 to July 1945.

@OliverXRed

From the little amount i have looked into Mosquito in USAAF, i only really found info on them using it in the Photo-Reconnaissance role. (US ordered F-8, and PR XVI)

The USAAF also operated the following Mosquito variants, including the NF.XXX:

UK-Built:

• PR.XVI
• NF.XXX
• T.III
• FB.IV/B.IV (Only two used unofficially; DZ357 and DZ368; all crashed)

Canadian-Built:

• B.VII
• B.XX

As far as I know, all Mosquitos acquired by the USAAF were converted and used in the PR role except the NF.30 night fighter.

[Master_Yoder]

Would love to see the T5 one day

[Morvran]

Anything perticularly unique about the T5?

[Master_Yoder]

Apart from the extra pilot, not much.

Guess as a premium, would just be nice to see some of the T birds in the tree

[Morvran]

The issue is the F53 there. But would be nice to see some do the earlier Lightning

[Master_Teaz]

maybe event? but F.2A/F.3 (I can’t remember which one can have 4x ADEN) would probably fit better as one

[Morvran]

Yeah, that sounds like fun. Especially if red tops ever get all-aspect the lightning F6/F53 moves up to 10.0

[Tubby_Vermin]

This update to British aviation is a solid improvement.

Greater variety keeps the game engaging and ensures its longevity. While some speculate that War Thunder may decline in the coming years, posts like this highlight how it can continue to flourish.

Every nation should take a similar approach prioritizing the introduction of domestically developed aircraft before incorporating copy-paste additions.

This strategy would lead to a more genuine sense of progression, avoiding excessive reliance on copy-paste content that merely extends the grind and prioritises revenue.

While I understand the business side of things, I want War Thunder to thrive.

I’ve invested significant time and money into this game, and it remains a diamond in the rough full of potential for improvement in every aspect.

Let’s go, Gaijin!

Time to break more Guinness World Records.

[PlayedStatue626]

Would love to see this happen.

Also holding out hope that GCAP does well enough to join this tree.

[Rileyy3437-live]

The prototype is due 2027 (rumoured to be ahead of schedule), I have already got a rough draft of a suggestion for it. Also Tempest proto 1 is confirmed to be doing armament testing including but not limited to Meteor and likely ASRAAM too from an internal bay. So won’t be an EAP scenario (EAP my beloved).

[PlayedStatue626]

Sweet!

[Sea_Harrier_FRS1]

@lxtav

Harrier GR.1 (XV277)

A Modified Harrier GR.1, outfitted as the Sea Harrier FRS.1 Prototype, this variant differs from the standard GR.1 with the inclusion of RWR and a mockup nose for the Blue Fox radar and equipped it to carry Martel Missiles

Armament

2 x 30mm Cannons*

• 2 x AIM-9 Sidewinder AAMs
• Up to 6000 lbs of bombs, rockets OR Martlet ARMs

Forgot about this aircraft but glad to see it came to the list. The radome looks longer and slimmer than I remember but I still like the look of it.

[PlayedStatue626]

I know this is a very long shot, but would there be any consideration for a similar concept, but for the UK naval branches?

[lxtav]

this was made a while ago by @Rileyy3437-live but thats about it iirc

Britain Naval Tree - What’s left to be added for all BRs

Thank-you to @Morvran for inspiring this post. His relevant post for the British Air Tree can be found here. [updated_british_naval_tree (1)] Current updated tree design This is a to be updated post for proposals for future additions to the British naval tree without necessitating a dedicated post on each of them to be added to the list. Most ships are in in the forms of the class however specific ships with historical significance or modification will also be added. SHIPS Please include …

I’ve currently got too much on my plate to update this, let alone work on another tree, so unfortunately I doubt i’ll ever make one

[PlayedStatue626]

That’s fine, keep up the good work and try not overwork yourself.

[专业的波兰自慰和愉悦服务公司]

Are there any pending suggestions for missing Tempest variants? (tempest I, III and VI)

[lxtav]

Not that i know of, and to my knowledge noone planning on doing them in the near future