Ukraine Ground Forces Tree

Wasn’t that suggestion just around 3100~ upvotes just yesterday? Now it’s 4981 about to be 5000?? Goodness.

3,000 or so people disagree with you IAW the vote but you’re more than welcome to having an opinion.

1 Like

2S22 Bohdana 3.0 on «Tatra» T815-7T3RC1 8x8.1R chassis

3 Likes

Let’s keep things civil here people. Don’t directly link suggestions mods in here, just flag it and send them a personal message as needed.

All opinions are accepted. 🤙

6 Likes

just noticed that he did that lol, not mentioning that he pinged the wrong persons about such a matter

Someone wrote here (while claiming to be an independent tree)…that the T-72 is not their main tank!?
In fact, it was so…
At the time of the collapse of the USSR, Ukraine had the following tank fleet (excluding T-54/55/62): T-64 – 2340 copies, T-72 – about 1300, T-80 – 260 (12 of them diesel) …
According to data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) in the period 1995 - 2015. Ukraine has sold 778 T-72 tanks of various modifications under export contracts…

2 Likes

If Israel can come to the game (especially in its current form), there is absolutely no issue of a Ukrainian or LATAM tree as they both have a lot of unique vehicles. I tend in my updated iterations of the Ukraine tree to include more unique developments into the research* tree.

Enough of the tit-for-tat, all that’s going to happen is the thread will get locked.

This goes for everyone, all opinions are welcome. If you’re a supporter, cool, if you’re not a supporter cool. I encourage everyone to leave feedback, but keep it friendly and cordial. Regardless if you like the tree or not, if you have criticism of the tree or someone’s statements, keep it friendly and fair, if you’re just going to insult it or anyone just save yourself the trouble and leave.

8 Likes

New photos of M1097 Avenger usage in 1129th Anti-aircraft missile regiment of Bila Tserkva


And the one from December

4 Likes

I don’t even know what happened!

1 Like

It wouldn’t mean having a joint Polish-Ukrainian line, Poland had tanks that could be placed in Tier I, II and III as well as in the high tier, this would also make the Poles happy to have their vehicles

[image]

3 Likes

I’ve got quite a bit of a revamp coming up and I intend to make sure that it better highlight’s Ukraine’s domestic capabilities with some inherited USSR vehicles (which I think is fair to some degree as many nations have this, but I will try to tailor it to a minimum). I appreciate everyone’s inputs 🤙

4 Likes

I did make a Polish-Ukrainian tree posted earlier in the comments if you haven’t seen it. I had issues with I-III though.

2 Likes

Ah, I see now what you mean. I agree with you completely and I can also personally identify with your reasoning, as I for the longest time didn’t even attempt to research the Challenger 2 line in my main tree until they were just recently foldered.

Yet I don’t think this reasoning can be used with this TT suggestion. Yontzee has done great work updating the suggestion with his latest iteration showing some great usage of foldering, which I will do you the service of quoting here:

One of these I personally disagree with, Yontzee seems to avoid folders larger than two (which is mostly warranted) but I believe the T-64BV zr. 2017 should be moved to Rank 6 into the folder with the other 64BV’s. But other than that this newer TT visualization should address your concerns.

I don’t and I hope you haven’t taken my words to mean such either. It’s very difficult with this forum layout to be entirely informed on a 1000 comment discussion and I shouldn’t expect you or anyone else to have read the entire thing like I have so I do apologies if you’ve felt attacked and I thank you for actually discussing and articulating your opinions for me. :D

1 Like

Created since July 2023 and now has about 1000 coments, this suggestion is still active?

Spoiler

Compared to my suggestions… not much activities,. Would be extatic if mine had same level of activeness. I must admit though, this suggestion definitly has way more effort put in. Props to Yontzee.

1 Like

We try to keep it active when it is warranted, ie posting new vehicles in use with the ZSU if they are modified and/or unseen in the tech-tree
Sometimes there are just new discussions to be had with potential additions (BTR-80UM), improvements to the techtree, suggestions, various pieces which could be added (ie a new camo, the symbol/patch of the ZSU which may deserve to be included,…)

T-55? I am unsure of what this is

We have also received ~800 new votes which have turned the approval from 73% to 69%. I do wonder where such a large, coordinated, and quick influx of votes has come from. Weird!

5 Likes

T-55AGM

1 Like

Whelp… That sucks, raid perhaps? Anyways, wierd.

1 Like

We have also received ~800 new votes which have turned the approval from 73% to 69%.

I don’t wonder why.

1 Like

Hey that’s 800 more votes of popularity 😎 lol. Gonna break 5,000 in no time

5 Likes