3 Likes
if anything it should be a Sub-Tree for russia
thats the proplem its not Russian TT its Soviet TT, ukrainians would never agree to go in a Russian TT nad i get it but its USSR TT and they are ex-USSR country so they have to go there or in a TT with other eastern countries like poland ,czechia etc…
1 Like
Or we could just do this idea.
1 Like
Honesty it’s pretty much what we have now
1 Like
Why cant we have people in photos? 💀 what if their hand or their leg is in the corner or edge of the image???
2 Likes
To my knowledge Ukraine has more unique vehicles than Finland tho. You can’t blame Gaijin on that specifically.
1 Like
Patria domain expansion vs T-series domain expansion
2 Likes
I’d rather Gaijin get the monetization off that grind rather than over bloat one of the largest tech trees in game making its grind a nightmare in total. You’ve already finished the tree, or at least I have. The grind won’t affect me. But it will newer players.
Not to mention that decision will drive away monetization heavily. We see tech trees unreasonably becoming everything tech trees rather than unique experiences like they were once promised to me. We don’t need Abrams and Leopard tanks in the “USSR” (Rushan) Tech Tree. We already have a British T-90S, Chinese Abrams, we were supposed to have a US T-90A before everyone canceled gaijin over it on the forums and Twitter, aswell as a US Tiger II. But here’s the thing. It kills the game loop. If you can just play any nation for any vehicle why’s even the point of going further than grinding two nations fully?
That only gives players less incentive to spend time and money on War Thunder. Limiting choices, and taking away uniqueness hurts not only the gameplay, players, but also the company. The amount of games that did what you asked for and died within a few years after it…
It doesn’t make sense from a tech tree size perspective, reality perspective, gameplay loop perspective, longevity of player retention perspective, let alone political. It simply doesn’t make any sense.
The reason the grind is bad is not due to the amount of vehicles its totally up to gaijin how to implement that besides if it was a separate tree it would have a ton of duplicated tanks which drives away other players like why would you grind a t72 and a zsu23 for the 11th time?
What if you want to grind the better version of the T-72 and ZSU 23?
2 Likes
I don’t mind “duplicates” also. You’re not forced to put things like the T-34 in there you can start it realistically from rank V - VI if you must skip unnecessary copy and paste. Just like how you said, “it’s not the amount of vehicles”. Can’t make that argument then promptly complain about the amount of vehicles. Whilst arguing that we should add copy and paste to the Rushan Tech Tree. You’re experiencing insane amounts of cognitive dissonance it’s ridiculous imo.
You’re arguing for and against the same things. Like wtf is your point, do you even understand it?
1 Like
“copy and paste is good only if it benefits me” is basically where it all ends up
1 Like
I’d rather Grind a SEPARATE version of th T-72. Than deal with the Rushan TT Leopard 2s & Abrams being on a Team full of T-90s, Oplots, Chinese Abrams vs US Abrams, GER Leopard 2s, etc. That’s ridiculously immersion breaking, repetitive, and makes grinding most trees literally redundant. Why buy extra premium when you can get several nations tanks in MULTIPLE tech trees. Tech Trees that are already bloated with the most content?
It’s the dumbest idea in WT period imo. Don’t add any sub trees to US, GER, RU, etc large tech trees. They too bloated as IS. The devs NEED to stop killing uniqueness, and killing the already repetitive game loop. It’s running players away veterans, and newbies.
2 Likes
It’s so stupid I swear. And every new guy that comes in here saying the exact same lines acts like they invented the idea… Ugh. Critical thinking is almost dead nowadays.
You get used to it, its pretty funny to see the same people oppose your tech tree because of “copy and paste” and then go begging Gaijin for those vehicles because they “suffer”, (I’m reffering to those German mains)
1 Like
Now some German mains arguing to get the Abrams too. What tf is even the point of a Tech Tree anymore? Between the devs and those players who don’t know wtf they are asking for. I stg. That just might be what kills this game. Not the Terminator but the gutting of the idea of a tech tree.
1 Like
Omg, they wanted the F-16, and Apache too? 💀 OML. I can’t stand this these garbage takes no more. Imagine in future we start getting suggestions for the Terminator to go to the US tree. Obviously, no matter what that’ll never happen. But it’s funny seeing the lack of principles across the board in 2025.
Yup all denied though by Smin lol
2 Likes
Thank goodness. It didn’t get as far as that US T-90A funnily enough.
2 Likes