You get used to it, its pretty funny to see the same people oppose your tech tree because of “copy and paste” and then go begging Gaijin for those vehicles because they “suffer”, (I’m reffering to those German mains)
1 Like
Now some German mains arguing to get the Abrams too. What tf is even the point of a Tech Tree anymore? Between the devs and those players who don’t know wtf they are asking for. I stg. That just might be what kills this game. Not the Terminator but the gutting of the idea of a tech tree.
1 Like
Omg, they wanted the F-16, and Apache too? 💀 OML. I can’t stand this these garbage takes no more. Imagine in future we start getting suggestions for the Terminator to go to the US tree. Obviously, no matter what that’ll never happen. But it’s funny seeing the lack of principles across the board in 2025.
Yup all denied though by Smin lol
2 Likes
Thank goodness. It didn’t get as far as that US T-90A funnily enough.
2 Likes
The strongest frankentank vehicles of today Vs the strongest frankentank vehicles in history
2 Likes
Honestly I would go further and say that neither the UK or France needed subtrees either.
then grind the better version im not advocating for unique vehicles to not be added but just reducing the amount of copy paste which would be needed to fill out a full ukraine ground tree
They probably didn’t need these sub-trees, but I believe they still would have benefited a lot from those weren’t subtrees treated like a source of endless copy-paste’ium.
Were Benelux and India introduced with more domestic(ly modified) vehicles in the TT (and not just gatekept behind paywall of premiums/events), they would have been regarded as worthy line-up extensions to those TTs… but oh well, adding 3 1:1 Leo2As in the same update is much easier.
… anyway, that’s a subject for a different topic overall
5 Likes
True, its disappointing the lack of effort put in
5 Likes
With infantry on the horizon, maybe grenade launching UGVs may help? Here’s a ThEmis with a Buria turret
(On an unrelated note, anyone got information on the AB-13s atgms?)
5 Likes
I pretty sure the Oplot-2M is the same as the Oplot-M, but it was just made a lot cheaper.
Supposedly better Duplet-2 ERA (lighter but at the same time better) ~ supposedly available in the one delivered to US.
…
but 2M’s proposed upgrades include 6TD-3 engine and Zaslon APS (among other minor updates) ~ these were not present in the sole model delivered to US
2 Likes
Sub tree but would be cool to see
what t84 is that?? ( i dont know were to ask)
Looks like an early variant, maybe an Object 478DU4 or 5? Basing it off the hull.
if it helps it took place in 2002 in trial in greece
That’s Object 478DU2.
From a rather quick search, it was the first version of DU series to receive “late” welded turret (the “early” one was used in batches of T-80UD/DUs for Pakistani forces) with thermals and new radio equipment.
Pretty much a Greek trialed version of early future Oplot.
3 Likes