What if you want to grind the better version of the T-72 and ZSU 23?
1 Like
I don’t mind “duplicates” also. You’re not forced to put things like the T-34 in there you can start it realistically from rank V - VI if you must skip unnecessary copy and paste. Just like how you said, “it’s not the amount of vehicles”. Can’t make that argument then promptly complain about the amount of vehicles. Whilst arguing that we should add copy and paste to the Rushan Tech Tree. You’re experiencing insane amounts of cognitive dissonance it’s ridiculous imo.
You’re arguing for and against the same things. Like wtf is your point, do you even understand it?
1 Like
“copy and paste is good only if it benefits me” is basically where it all ends up
1 Like
I’d rather Grind a SEPARATE version of th T-72. Than deal with the Rushan TT Leopard 2s & Abrams being on a Team full of T-90s, Oplots, Chinese Abrams vs US Abrams, GER Leopard 2s, etc. That’s ridiculously immersion breaking, repetitive, and makes grinding most trees literally redundant. Why buy extra premium when you can get several nations tanks in MULTIPLE tech trees. Tech Trees that are already bloated with the most content?
It’s the dumbest idea in WT period imo. Don’t add any sub trees to US, GER, RU, etc large tech trees. They too bloated as IS. The devs NEED to stop killing uniqueness, and killing the already repetitive game loop. It’s running players away veterans, and newbies.
2 Likes
It’s so stupid I swear. And every new guy that comes in here saying the exact same lines acts like they invented the idea… Ugh. Critical thinking is almost dead nowadays.
You get used to it, its pretty funny to see the same people oppose your tech tree because of “copy and paste” and then go begging Gaijin for those vehicles because they “suffer”, (I’m reffering to those German mains)
1 Like
Now some German mains arguing to get the Abrams too. What tf is even the point of a Tech Tree anymore? Between the devs and those players who don’t know wtf they are asking for. I stg. That just might be what kills this game. Not the Terminator but the gutting of the idea of a tech tree.
1 Like
Omg, they wanted the F-16, and Apache too? 💀 OML. I can’t stand this these garbage takes no more. Imagine in future we start getting suggestions for the Terminator to go to the US tree. Obviously, no matter what that’ll never happen. But it’s funny seeing the lack of principles across the board in 2025.
Yup all denied though by Smin lol
2 Likes
Thank goodness. It didn’t get as far as that US T-90A funnily enough.
2 Likes
The strongest frankentank vehicles of today Vs the strongest frankentank vehicles in history
2 Likes
Honestly I would go further and say that neither the UK or France needed subtrees either.
then grind the better version im not advocating for unique vehicles to not be added but just reducing the amount of copy paste which would be needed to fill out a full ukraine ground tree
They probably didn’t need these sub-trees, but I believe they still would have benefited a lot from those weren’t subtrees treated like a source of endless copy-paste’ium.
Were Benelux and India introduced with more domestic(ly modified) vehicles in the TT (and not just gatekept behind paywall of premiums/events), they would have been regarded as worthy line-up extensions to those TTs… but oh well, adding 3 1:1 Leo2As in the same update is much easier.
… anyway, that’s a subject for a different topic overall
5 Likes
True, its disappointing the lack of effort put in
5 Likes
With infantry on the horizon, maybe grenade launching UGVs may help? Here’s a ThEmis with a Buria turret
(On an unrelated note, anyone got information on the AB-13s atgms?)
5 Likes
I pretty sure the Oplot-2M is the same as the Oplot-M, but it was just made a lot cheaper.
Supposedly better Duplet-2 ERA (lighter but at the same time better) ~ supposedly available in the one delivered to US.
…
but 2M’s proposed upgrades include 6TD-3 engine and Zaslon APS (among other minor updates) ~ these were not present in the sole model delivered to US
2 Likes