Is there a chance to update the first post (description of the proposal)? A lot has changed since the thread was created. New people come in, see the T-34-85 and IS-2 at the forefront of the Ukrainian tree, and immediately, without reading the thread, write about “copy-pasting.” This also affects the voting. Most don’t even know about the proposal to split the Soviet tree into post-Soviet countries, which, in my opinion, is the only solution to the issue with aircraft in the Ukrainian tree. It also completely solves the “copy-pasting” issue in the ground tree.
9 Likes
The description has included other options like the “compromise” since I released the original suggestion on the old forum from last year. People see copy/paste vehicles regardless if I change the description or not and automatically go straight to complaining about it or “how Ukraine is a former USSR state and should go there”, etc. I do want to thank all those who take the time to read the suggestion and understand it in full before voting.
I do agree, the suggestion is due for a rework which I’ve slowly been working on over-time. Please stay tuned 🙂
P.S. As for aircraft, there will have to be copy-paste in that tree but with new additions such as the F-16AM and Mirage 2000-5F, etc. on-top of Ukrainian modifications such as the MiG-29UM2, and Su-27S1M, etc., I hope that will help ease people’s concerns.
7 Likes
Given we have Georgian 🇬🇪 vehicles in this tree, the cooperation between the two countries and similar “geopolitical realities” between them, we could add the Su-25KM to the Air-Tree aswell.
Israeli Opher, Lizard LGBs
Modern Cockpit
NATO Compatibility (ie, RWR)
R-73s
This would be the tree’s AMX-1A, which also uses the Israeli Lizard bombs
1 Like
I’m actually working on updating the tree right now, so I’ve already made a tech tree template for it.
2 Likes
Ukrainian Leopard 2A4CAN (we already seen this one last summer on different photos)
Ukrainian T-72AV
4 Likes
Ukrainian BTR-70M with BM-7 combat module
8 Likes
Sick. I hope we see the BTR-70DI that has the Zaslin APS equipped with a BM-7 or similar module.
Currently it has the 14.5mm KPVT Machine Gun, 2x Ready-to-Fire Barrier-212 (RK-2S) ATGM’s with 2x spares, a 30mm KBA-117 Grenade Launcher, and coaxial KT-7.62mm machine gun. There is a version of the BTR-70DI equipped with a Ingul Remote Weapon Station that does have a 30mm autocannon on it, it doesn’t have the APS equipped.
5 Likes
It gets apfsds as well lol
Don’t we already have that? I’m sorry, I’m in another service. That’s why I can’t physically keep up with it. and the situation does not allow it!
Yes*, on the MTLB chassis as the first vehicle!
This can replace it, but shouldnt be another independent vehicle
The BTR-94 is a better platform in all aspects
In game? We have the same weapons system on the MTLB in the Soviet tree.
Just thought I would post it
As your own tree - no. there is no point in this and we will have a second clone wars tree + a lot of Ukrainian modernizations of Soviet equipment, they are not that interesting and will not bring anything new to the game, in fact these are simple T64/72s and 80s that are already in the game. Therefore, it is better to place them in the Soviet tree, like Russian, Syrian, Czech tanks and so on.
2 Likes
Stop with offtopic please.
6 Likes
I will definitely add this vehicle in the upcoming tree update.
Also, thinking of adding the BTR-7 (Parus) as like a 8.7 BR vehicle since many of them aren’t equipping the Barrier-212 ATGM system. Pretty much a wheeled autocannon boi.
9 Likes
Ukrainian T-90M
Possible candidate for premium vehicle since it’s a second one that is actually in service.
7 Likes
He’s not needed.
1 Like
What do you mean?
1 Like
What he means is the IRL sentiments