Could be but there is literally no point to it plus it would be wildly out of place
4 Likes
Yeah, realistically speaking Ukrainian tree starts at 9.3 at air, 8.0-9.0 at ground and at 8.0 heli tree. Anything below is either an SPAA, SPG or BMP-1 of some sorts.
Given the rapid popularity of a new South-American Coalition tree proposed only a day or two ago, I think we should take notes.
I do understand that some meddling has taken place in the vote here, due to the current situation and the demographics of warthunder players, but perhaps we should look towards this other tree with a 90% plus approval rating and see what it does that we don’t.
(We = Yontzee, 100% his work)
-
A harder push to the new USSR-Tree idea from Blastertitan and a detailed explanation of the idea - solving the “low tier” problem which the S.American tree doesn’t have.
The people have already shown that they are not opposed to “Coalition-Trees” there and elsewhere, so this would not be far fetched. -
A greater consideration for the special/sub trees in the suggestion - more Georgian, Kazakh, if appropriate, especially for special vehicles or the Air-Forces. Might be best for the tree, even if some sacrifices must be made.
-
More graphics addressing key issues - “copy paste” percentage, what should properly constitute a “copy paste” vehicle, so it is easier for readers to digest and the issue is not continually brought up again.
-
Perhaps exploration into stronger promotion of the tree and suggestion?
They have a discord community, which atleast partly explains the rapid vote-count and high approval rating (for now, until it is balanced out by wider community opinion)
All in your own time. We are all busy. Just spitballing and I don’t want to put pressure on anyone!
Thanks!
It is exam szn and I myself am busy so I would not want to impart this on anyone else, especially given the colossal work already done
8 Likes
By the way, what I have proposed can be used not only for the USSR… This will allow other countries to be added to the existing trees under their own flag.
4 Likes
maybe quickly name the idea, there bunch of different solutions running around and blastertitan does not have his own thread where it could be looked up
2 Likes
By the way, this decision is discussed not only here. It is also mentioned in discussions about other nations. But it is quite difficult to find it…
Or perhaps… not?
72% approval is still very high. Considering that Latin America is not represented in the game at all while having decently sized community, 90% support is not surprising.
Also our usual RU forum guests are “interested” only in Ukrainian tree for obvious reason. You won’t see those usual haters in LATAM tree thread complaining about “clones”, despite the fact that the tree also contains sizeable chunk of imported vehicles from other nations.
So I don’t see the reason to change anything tbh. War Thunder will implement all nations with distinct ground forces eventually, because they already have no choice and almost reached the cap on existing nations. So we must focus on independent Ukrainian tree, not chaotically adjust because haters exist.
2 Likes
We can always improve! This is just a suggestion, I am not asking for trying to force anything!
I do realise this, and that might make a percentage of the vote, but there are certainly people with genuine concerns we could rectify
4 Likes
Wasn’t that suggestion just around 3100~ upvotes just yesterday? Now it’s 4981 about to be 5000?? Goodness.
3,000 or so people disagree with you IAW the vote but you’re more than welcome to having an opinion.
1 Like
2S22 Bohdana 3.0 on «Tatra» T815-7T3RC1 8x8.1R chassis
3 Likes
Let’s keep things civil here people. Don’t directly link suggestions mods in here, just flag it and send them a personal message as needed.
All opinions are accepted. 🤙
6 Likes
just noticed that he did that lol, not mentioning that he pinged the wrong persons about such a matter
Someone wrote here (while claiming to be an independent tree)…that the T-72 is not their main tank!?
In fact, it was so…
At the time of the collapse of the USSR, Ukraine had the following tank fleet (excluding T-54/55/62): T-64 – 2340 copies, T-72 – about 1300, T-80 – 260 (12 of them diesel) …
According to data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) in the period 1995 - 2015. Ukraine has sold 778 T-72 tanks of various modifications under export contracts…
2 Likes
If Israel can come to the game (especially in its current form), there is absolutely no issue of a Ukrainian or LATAM tree as they both have a lot of unique vehicles. I tend in my updated iterations of the Ukraine tree to include more unique developments into the research* tree.
Enough of the tit-for-tat, all that’s going to happen is the thread will get locked.
This goes for everyone, all opinions are welcome. If you’re a supporter, cool, if you’re not a supporter cool. I encourage everyone to leave feedback, but keep it friendly and cordial. Regardless if you like the tree or not, if you have criticism of the tree or someone’s statements, keep it friendly and fair, if you’re just going to insult it or anyone just save yourself the trouble and leave.
8 Likes
New photos of M1097 Avenger usage in 1129th Anti-aircraft missile regiment of Bila Tserkva
And the one from December
4 Likes
I don’t even know what happened!
1 Like
It wouldn’t mean having a joint Polish-Ukrainian line, Poland had tanks that could be placed in Tier I, II and III as well as in the high tier, this would also make the Poles happy to have their vehicles
[image]
3 Likes
I’ve got quite a bit of a revamp coming up and I intend to make sure that it better highlight’s Ukraine’s domestic capabilities with some inherited USSR vehicles (which I think is fair to some degree as many nations have this, but I will try to tailor it to a minimum). I appreciate everyone’s inputs 🤙
4 Likes
I did make a Polish-Ukrainian tree posted earlier in the comments if you haven’t seen it. I had issues with I-III though.
2 Likes