Can someone explain this to me before I start a bloody argument here. Who and why invented the thing that if, for example, I fly with this helicopter to the battlefield where, if I am very lucky, I will be taken down with a machine gun by a gunner from a tank who does not even get one pilot out of that tank, and this helicopter loses the advantage of using any weapon in battle? If at least the other pilot was looking for and marking the targets, but he doesn’t do anything at all and there is still the possibility that someone will take him down? It’s already hard to get there and this is the nail in the coffin. Bravo, I can do nothing but applaud the invention in question.