-
1: “fine” isn’t fun
-
2: The fiat is much more mobile and erratic to hit
-
3: “7.3 is reasonable” has to be the worst take I’ve ever heard.
The OP is just blatantly wrong.
3 Likes
Fiat 6614 carries almost twice as much ammo, is much faster, and can shoot while exposing ONLY its gun, being almost invulnerable while doing it.
1 Like
So you admit its a skill issue?
I’ve never said that Type 60 SPRG was OP. I just said it might seem OP for the one who got killed by it (like the original poster claimed). Yet I think that a dual barreled machine with 433mm shouldn’t be at the same BR as a Tiger II.
I’ve refered to the Fiat R3 T106 FA which is similar double barreled like the SPRG and also has exactly 10 shells. Why is everyone upset that I support a BR raise of this thing? Is it that strange that I want something nerved that I play myself?
Because it’s already not great at its existing BR. Though at least now you have enough ammo to actually impact the match instead of getting maybe a few kills before dying to a remote controlled .50cal or a sneeze from a plane.
And what I said earlier about the 6614 is even more true for the T106: it has way more ammo, it’s much faster, and can be completely invulnerable while shooting you.
Everything that kills me is OP and must go to 15.0 immediately.
4 Likes
It’s literally just trading your armor for penetration (which is pretty mid when fighting tanks of that BR, as it has little post-pen effect)
1 Like
I’ve made it my mission to get the Type 60 ATM as the last vehicle i get in Japan, also the Type 60 SPRG is fine at 6.7, it’s goofy, but by no means OP
1 Like
Nor should it be fighting Br’s such as IS-3s, Leopard I’s, and Wiesel’s. Etc. Your entire argument has been just like the original poster based on the emotions of dying in the game rather than based on how the thing performs as someone who’s a Japan Main and spaded every vehicle while also continuously using it here and there.
Sure, you have two guns, and I’ll repeat this sentiment. If you do not have the keybind, it will fire both guns. Even if you do, one still won’t always be enough to kill a vehicle. I’ve once nearly depleted almost all six rounds for one tank. Its post-pen isn’t a lot.
Another thing while .50s will kill you. Any 7.92->7.62 can still kill you if you bother to aim the MG. So it fires into the open space. On the left side of the hull.
Wow, every assumption about me is completely wrong! I do play Japan as a first nation (and I avoid the word ‘‘main’’ because I hate it) and I am on my way spading every Japanese vehicle and the Type 60 SPRG is no exception.
And I did play against Japan as France and USSR on another account and I never really had anything against it.
Yes you are right, the Type 60 SPRG can be killed with a machine gun, just like many vehicles at different BRs do. But because of its very week armour its defensive capabilities would be similar atrocious at different BRs. Unlike its firepower which clearly does not belong at 6.7. Especially after the addition of ammo boxes, its second biggest downside, which is low ammo count, has much less impact on its performance.
So no, I am not at all talking about Type 60 SPRG from a ‘‘playing against it’’ perspective. The biggest insight that caused me to support a BR raise of Type 60 came only after getting my hands on it.
Writing me a large paragraph without any proper punctuation, nor writing it in a way that makes it digestible are often comments built off emotions, not reason. So not gonna bother to read it cause nothing you wrote is a valid reason to move it. To give credit where its due you did Involuntarily reinforce many of our counterarguments. :D Thanks.
That’s all you can say? You’re clearly too afraid to read too much truth that does not correspond to your wishes. Otherwise you wouldn’t respond with wrong punctuation/no paragraphs. But If that’s what you need, then I’ll edit my text. Just for you!
What.
You know what. Gotchu.
@TheElite96 I don’t know what FFar is on but pretty sure at this point he’s just going off-topic heavily.
3x the guns, 2x the ammo, and not an open top.
A gun that isn’t ass
a TWO PLANE STABILIZED early MBT
M47 gun
What do all of these have in common? They’re all 6.7 GRB, not suitable in the slightest for 9.3 (not even sure how you got to that number) and have “too much firepower”.
1 Like
I’m pretty sure you’ve heard worse lol the other day one CAS main said Maus will be 9.0 if there is no CAS
2 Likes
Yep because its totally CAS that kills them all and not HEAT-FS from 3 out of 4 of the vehicles I posted ))))
Yeah, Maus without CAS would be 9.0 material without an issue, as if it can’t get OHK’d by 6.3 SPHs lol.
1 Like
even more true for the T106: it has way more ammo
no it doesn’t, the T106 has the same 10 rounds as the type 60, arguably the T106 has less because it didn’t get an ammo box.
that’s all I have to say, the type 60 is fine where it is and so is the t106