Type 24 ICV (P) issue:
Despite higher power-to-weight ratio (19.4-21.9 hp/t) compared to BTR-82AT (17.6 hp/t), the Type 24 performs worse on slopes. Tested at E3 southern slopes in Test Drive (reproducible by anyone). This suggests torque values are either incorrectly modeled or arbitrarily limited.
Additional Replay available: Reverse torque (6:46 - Golden Quarry):
https://warthunder.com/en/tournament/replay/504332381500312617
The comparison is worth investigating, but power-to-weight ratio alone does not establish a torque bug. Hill performance also depends on the engine torque curve, gear ratios and shift logic, wheel traction, transmission losses, mass distribution and surface conditions. A vehicle with a lower listed hp/t can therefore outperform another one on a particular slope.
For a reproducible comparison, use the same map, surface, slope and starting speed; record modifications, crew level, fuel/ammunition load, selected gear, speed and engine RPM. Testing both vehicles fully upgraded and with automatic versus manual transmission would be especially useful. Please attach the client replay and .clog as well. If the Type 24 consistently loses speed under identical conditions, the controlled result would support a proper bug report much more strongly than the stat-card figures alone.