Type 1 Ho-Ni II

Do you want to see the Type 1 Ho-Ni II being implemented ?
  • Yes!
  • No.
0 voters

Type 1 Ho-Ni II, Tank Destroyer, Japan, Rank 2

The development of the Type 1 105mm Self-Propelled Gun, known as the Ho-Ni II, was part of Japan’s efforts to bolster its armored capabilities during World War II. With the need for rapid prototyping, Japanese military engineers often drew inspiration from existing German designs. The Ho-Ni II was based on the concept of the German Wespe, utilizing the chassis of the Panzer II tank. Its purpose was to modernize the self-propelled artillery units within tank divisions or brigades using the chassis of the outdated Type 97 Medium Tank. Despite favorable trial results, production of the Ho-Ni II was limited, with only a few units completed. This highlights the challenges Japan faced in matching the industrial output and technological advancements of its adversaries during the conflict.


Following the outbreak of war with the United States, the development of armored fighting vehicles (AFVs) by the Japanese military often involved directly referencing existing vehicles from the German army in order to expedite the prototyping process. While towards the end of the Pacific War, there were instances of studying American tanks by the technical side, the Imperial General Staff remained heavily reliant on German designs, with little reference to AFVs from other countries such as the United States or the Soviet Union.

The Type 1 105mm Self-Propelled Gun (Ho-Ni II) was developed based on the concept of the 10.5cm self-propelled howitzer Wespe, which was deployed in the mobile artillery regiments of the German armored divisions and was based on the chassis of the Panzer II tank. The purpose of developing this vehicle, similar to the Type 1 Gun Tank (Ho-Ni I), was to convert the self-propelled artillery units within tank divisions or tank brigades using the chassis of the outdated Type 97 Medium Tank (Chi-Ha) that was becoming obsolete.

The Tank Divisions established in 1942 consisted of two Tank Brigades (each with two Tank Regiments), one Mobile Infantry Regiment, and one Mobile Artillery Regiment, among other units. The Mobile Artillery Regiment comprised one battalion equipped with Type 90 Field Guns (75mm caliber) and two battalions equipped with Type 91 105mm Howitzers.

The Ho-Ni I was a self-propelled version of the Type 90 Field Gun, while the Ho-Ni II was intended to be a self-propelled version of the Type 91 105mm Howitzer. Development of the Type 1 105mm Self-Propelled Gun, codenamed “Ho-Ni II,” began in March 1941, and prototype vehicles were completed by mid-1942, undergoing practical trials at the Army Field Artillery School.

Due to favorable trial results, it was standardized as the “Type 1 105mm Self-Propelled Gun” within the same year. Production of the Ho-Ni II, like the Ho-Ni I, was carried out at the Hitachi Kameari Factory. It is said that a total of 138 units of the Ho-Ni I and Ho-Ni II combined were completed after November 1943, although production of the Ho-Ni II seems to have been very limited.

The chassis of the Ho-Ni II vehicle was largely based on that of the Chi-Ha tank, with the combat compartment enclosed by armored plates, similar to the Ho-Ni I, surrounding the main gun. As direct anti-tank combat was not the primary mission and instead focused on long-range indirect fire, the armor was not as strong as the Ho-Ni I (with a maximum armor thickness of 50mm), with the front of the hull and combat compartment being 25mm thick.

Rear View

Like the Ho-Ni I, the top and rear of the combat compartment were open, providing no protection for the crew from shell fragments resulting from enemy shell or bomb explosions. The main gun mounted was the Type 91 105mm howitzer with a caliber of 105mm and a barrel length of 2,090mm. Therefore, while the Ho-Ni I was a self-propelled field gun, the Ho-Ni II was a self-propelled howitzer.

Front View

Regarding the effectiveness of the Type 91 105mm howitzer, artillery units that went to Burma reported “being able to destroy M4 medium tanks with shells.” However, initially, anti-tank duties were not envisaged. Except for anti-aircraft guns, guns with a caliber of 105mm or more had separate shells and propellant charges/bags, requiring two actions to load and resulting in a relatively reduced rate of fire.

Side View

The barrel was of monobloc construction, with a muzzle ring for reinforcement, and lacked a muzzle brake to reduce recoil during firing. The breech mechanism was of the interrupted screw type, and the gun carriage was slightly modified for vehicle mounting. The muzzle velocity was 454m/s, with a maximum range of 10,800m. The gun elevation angle ranged from -15 to +25 degrees, and the traverse angle was 11 degrees to the left and right. The number of rounds carried is variously reported as 20 or 16 rounds.


Note the shape of gun shields and viewports location are different.

X-ray parts described in Russian

IO5 mm Howitzer Type 9I (I93I)

The Type 91 105mm Howitzer is a light-weight field piece designed for horse-drawn artillery units. Its wooden wheels and light construction make high-speed mobility impossible. The gun itself is of modern design, featuring an interrupted screw-type breech mechanism, a hydropneumatic recoil mechanism, and spring-type equilibrators.

Elevating and traversing handwheels, a range drum, and sight are located to the left of the breech. Calculation of firing data and sighting may be accomplished as with U.S. Artillery. The firing mechanism is a simple percussion hammer pivoted at the base of the breech, actuated by a lanyard.

This howitzer has been encountered frequently and is believed to be a standard weapon in division artillery.

Firing 105mm Type 1 APHE

Source: https://stephentaylorhistorian.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/special-series-34-japanese-tank-and-antitank-warfare.pdf

This gun can fire HEAT munition and achieve a penetration of up to 120mm.

It’s the third column from the right.

With the assistance of @tester188, we’ve obtained additional data regarding this specific HEAT ammunition, as follows:

  • Shell weight: 10.910 kg
  • Explosive type: TNT + RDX
  • Explosive mass: 1.590 kg
  • Penetration: 120 mm
  • Shell velocity: 337 m/s

Source: 研究事項ニ関スル綴〔内容明細裏面〕 (Page 144).

Regarding armor penetration, with AP rounds, the penetration limits against steel plates were 63mm at a distance of 1500m, 70mm at 1000m, 76mm at 500m, and 83mm at 100m. Additionally, according to information from the former U.S. War Department in August 1945, based on captured specimens of this gun and using Type 1 AP rounds, the penetration values under a 90-degree impact angle were approximately 2.7 inches (about 69mm) at a range of 750 yards (about 685.8m), 2.8 inches (about 71mm) at 500 yards (about 457.2m), and 2.95 inches (about 75mm) at 250 yards (about 228.6m).

(According to combat reports from around 1945 in the Philippines, hits at close range were deemed effective regardless of the hit location. The type of ammunition used in these reports is unspecified.)

For Type 3 High-Explosive Anti-Tank (HEAT) shells, they were capable of penetrating armor of 120mm thickness at a range of 1000m and 80mm thickness at 500m. Approximately 9,000 rounds of Type 3 HEAT shells were produced at the Osaka Army Arsenal Hirakata Manufacturing Plant.

Additional Images

Ho-Ni II in tri-color camouflage. Note the ammunition box on the engine deck.

Gun breach of the Type 91 10.5cm mounted on the Ho-Ni II.

Depressed main gun.

The gun elevation, depression and traverse angles are the same as Ho-Ni I.
-15/20-25 degree low and high field of fire and 11 degree left and right field of fire.

Vehicle Specifications: Type 1 10cm Self-Propelled Gun (Ho-Ni II)

  • Dimensions:
    • Length: 5.52 meters
    • Width: 2.33 meters
    • Height: 2.39 meters
  • Weight:
    • Gross Weight: 16.3 tons
  • Crew:
    • Crew Members: 5
  • Engine:
    • Type: Mitsubishi SA12200VD 4-Stroke V12 Air-Cooled Diesel
    • Maximum Output: 170hp @ 2,000rpm
  • Performance:
    • Maximum Speed: 38 km/h
    • Range: 200 km
  • Armament:
    • Main Gun: Type 91 10cm Howitzer (Caliber: 19.9)
    • Ammunition: 20 rounds
  • Armor:
    • Thickness: 12-25 mm
  • Penetration Power (Armor-Piercing Shell):
    • 1500m: 63mm
    • 1000m: 70mm
    • 500m: 76mm
    • 100m: 83mm
  • Penetration Power (High-Explosive Anti-Tank Shell - Type 3 HEAT):
    • 1000m: 120mm
    • 500m: 80mm
  • Additional Information:
    • The vehicle’s chassis is based on that of the Chi-Ha tank.
    • Armor configuration primarily focuses on indirect aiming and long-range firing rather than direct anti-tank combat.
    • Combat compartment lacks full protection against fragments from enemy artillery or bombs.

Type 91 10.5 cm howitzer specifications (Towed howitzer)

  • Caliber: 105 mm (4.095 in.)
  • Length of bore: 25 calibers
  • Weight (overall): 4,360 lbs.
  • Length (overall): 17 ft.
  • Muzzle velocity: 1,790 ft/sec.
  • Max. Range: 11,700 yds.
  • Rate of fire: 6/8 rds/min.
  • Traverse: 45 degrees
  • Elevation: 45 degrees
  • Depression: 5 degrees
  • Breech block: Interrupted thread
  • Wt. of projectile: 34.74 lbs.
  • Ammunition: HE and Hollow charge

Scale models




一式十糎自走砲 - Wikipedia
九一式十糎榴弾砲 - Wikipedia
一式十糎自走砲 ホニII
Type 1 Ho-Ni II
Ho-Ni II


+1, shocking we don’t have this already as it’s an actually mass produced Japanese tank of WWII. I see it as 2.3 TT material, hopefully alongside comparable designs such as the Sexton, M7, and Wespe


The Three Ho-Ni’s

The shields of the Ho-Ni 1 and 2 look similar except for the mantlet. And the plate covering the hull MG seems larger than Ho-Ni 1.


I was glad when i saw it was in a leak list sometime ago but it never came so it was a fake leak list :(

This looks really interesting. I’m glad to see that there’s enough difference between all the Ho-Ni variants so that they can all be included.

1 Like

Wait, the pen goes less at closer range? Is this something to do with arming distance or something?


I was wondering the same. Is it because the slower the projectile travel the better penetration ? Old HEAT rounds tend to having difficulty in properly arming the fuze if it travel too fast, this is why most HEAT shells have low velocity.

But i don’t think this will be replicated into the game, i don’t think any HEAT shell have different penetrations based on the distance in WT.


Yeah with all the HEAT I got my hands on, they seem to have uniform pen value across all distances… With that being said though, the mechanic for less pen depending on distance exists in the form of LOSAT, if Gaijin wanted to this mechanic could happen…though it would be a tad annoying.


Could be like N4MELESS said, but other Japanese HEAT rounds (70mm & 75mm) used instantaneous fuzes (Type 88) mounted in the nose so there wouldn’t have been much of a delay at either distance.
I would also consider the spin of the projectile, since it may slow down after some time. The rotational forces tend to reduce the effectiveness of HEAT rounds, and these may be lessened the further the round travels.


This would be excellent at the 2.0-2.3 BR. I think if played right, it would certainly punch above its weight. I would like to see this foldered with the Ho-Ni I. The Ho-Ni III should have its own place in the tree imo


Yes, the Ho-Ni I and II although were anti-tank capable especially the Ho-Ni I, they however were classified as self-propelled field gun and howitzer respectively since they utilized artillery guns and were also used for indirect fire support.

The Ho-Ni III however was Japan’s first tank designed during the shifting of focus from infantry support to anti-tank warfare. And was a dedicated anti-tank vehicle equipped with a actual tank gun.

1 Like

Update: Added all important data about the 10.5cm HEAT shell !


How much filler does the 105 mm Type 95 Aphe have?
For pen calculation i have now 105mm 15,87 kg 442m/s, but the filler is missing.

Very annoying. LOSAT were kinetic rocket powered penetrators, so you would have to cludge it pretty hard for a shell.
Probably a typo/mistranslation in the source material.

Someone go back in time and tell the Japanese to not put boxes of explody ammo on the back deck of the SPGs please…

Just created a post on this tank too, they NEED to add this!

1 Like


nvm, it got nuked. how can we bring attention to this?


1 Like

A +1 this vehicle needs to be in the game like yesterday, plus it does exist in the files already