Oh well, after ram, more silksong time
1 Like
| System | Missile(s) | Range (km) | Altitude (km) | Speed / Guidance | Radar / Sensors | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buk-1 (Kub-M4) | 3M9M3 / 9M38 | ~24 / ~35 | ~14 / ~22 | Mach 2.5 / Mach 3.5; semi-active radar homing | 1S91 “Straight Flush” + 9A38 TELAR | Transitional Kub/Buk hybrid system |
| SPYDER-MR | Derby / Python-5 | ~50–60 | ~16–20 | Mach 4; active / IR guidance | Elta EL/M-2106, 2084 MMR | Israeli system, multi-missile, strong ECCM capabilities |
| SLAMRAAM | AIM-120 AMRAAM | ~25–40 | ~15–20 | Mach 4; active radar guidance | AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel | US/Norwegian, mobile, AMRAAM-based air defense |
| Sky Sabre | CAMM | ~25+ | ~10+ | Mach 3+; active radar guidance | Giraffe AMB + MBDA C2 | UK system, soft-launch CAMM missile |
| IRIS-T SLM | IRIS-T SL / SLM | ~40 | ~20 | Mach 3+; IR seeker + GPS/INS, datalink | AESA radar variants (e.g. CEAFAR/GBR) | German, IR missile adapted for ground launch (family of IRIS-T) |
| EldE 98 (Sweden) | IRIS-T SLS (ground-launched IRIS-T) | ~12 | ~8 | IR homing, Lock-On Before/After Launch | No onboard radar—relies on separate MRU (e.g. Giraffe 1X) or Intelligence Unit 23 | Swedish short-range mobile system (Fire Unit 98 on Bv410) |
| Tan-SAM Kai | Tan-SAM Kai missile | ~12 | ~9 | Mach 2.5 | J/FPS-3 Kai, FCS-3 (naval variant) | Japanese modern short-range system |
| CS/SA5 | FM-90 (HQ-7 family) | ~15 | ~6 | Mach 2.3 | IBIS-80 / Type 305 | Chinese export SHORAD, Crotale derivative |
| Pantsir-S1 | 57E6 / 57E6-E missiles + 30 mm guns | ~20 (missile), ~4 (gun) | ~10 (missile), ~3 (gun) | Missile: up to ~1,300 m/s; radio-command guidance | Multi-band phased-array radar (UHF/EHF) + EO/IR system (optical + thermal) | Russian combined missile/ARTY point-AD; highly mobile & multichannel |
5 Likes
It’s a post-soviet tank…
Other than the Stingray, I don’t care about the rest of the update so far, and the trailer was legitimately terrible in presentation. Looked like some mish-mashed fortnite free for all kind of garbage.
3 Likes
Giving it to Japan does seem like the smart thing to do. Putting Ukrainian vehicles under Russia, even if they are originally from there, is asking for a spotlight that does not need shining.
3 Likes
Poland and eastern europe look good! But other than that and the Thai ground tree why is this a major update? there is no mechanical fixes or damage model corrections besides the tiger IIp! I understand adding vehicles is important but yall really need to round off the jagged edges of the game!
That was not a 64E, its missing so much if it is.
J-10B when, it’s kinda overdue.
1 Like
It was revealed to them in a dream
2 Likes
Does it do anything special I haven’t heard of? Personally I would’ve really liked an A-3 or B-58
This trailer is so… mid. It’s as bad as the Hornet’s Sting one. Nothing in this trailer looks particularly interesting, maybe aside from the Oplot. I bet that half of this update is going to be premium rubbish, or the standard Gaijin copy and paste
1 Like
Let’s be honest the USA was highly over preforming with that spaa. Nobody else even compared.
Me wondering when I can send S-300s at people 3 maps away
1 Like
Spoiler
You said:
And I would like an S-300 lol
Well it is essentially an A-3 - except it has a slightly heavier bomb-load at 15k lbs vs about 13k lbs.
B-58 seems like a case of wishful thinking winning out of reality.
Isn’t it a whole lot slower than the A-5? And they did at least test conventional bombs on the B-58
Wait, my bad, I meant the A-5
Carrier-based bomber would be peak though
In which case - it has tail guns :)
and a much bigger bombload I think - the A-5 only carried about 4-5,000 lbs??
But it could be introduced as a new Nuke carrier in GRB??
sure - if you think “peak” is carrying around equipment and added weight for no purpose in the game.
It’s a sort of form over function peak
1 Like