That is probably straight wrong information.
That may be the case since if not entirely the case I don’t think the Turks used any weapon of that calibre outside of the Valentines. The next closest calibre would be the 5cm PaK 38 since Turkish Panzer III’s were equipped with that gun. Even then I highly doubt that since it runs towards the same problems in regards to the claimed 57mm.
This is Player Count Statistics for War Thunder still there is no Türkiye and Poland tech tree in the game not even any news about these countries
Ooh where did you get this from?
more americans than russians ??? no way
Well I’m not exactly sure what is the source for 57mm, but I can tell you that it is incorrect. We’ve images of this conversion from Parades and there is no armament visible other than .50cal. Even information plaque on the Etimesgut seems incorrect as much of the information are carried over from regular M24.
Eh even Valentines had 40mm cannon
Problem with the other vehicles is that they exist in the game or have a place for it. The 2A6EX has a derivative in the form of the 2A6 HEL, which’ll likely come to the Israeli tree when the Greek subtree is added, not to mention that Germany themselves could get it… The Leclercs are in the French tree and both M1A2s are already in their respective trees. I’ve seen the name “Leopard2A6TR” which could be interesting but I have no idea what it offers over the regular Leopard 2A6EX.
The Yatagan as you said wouldn’t be necessary, but its unique. The only other place it would go is a Ukrainian tree, which would already have many versions of the Oplot that’re just as interesting. Gaijin seems to be following a trend where these trialed MBTs are squadron (T 80 U, “Oplot-M”). But whether the Leopard 2NG or the Yatagan is better as a squadron vehicle is not something I can decide. Both are sweet, and I want both :)
I’m a big fan of “what-if” situations, if you can’t tell
I wholly agree here. Leopard
2A6TR was just a simp designation. Similarly sometimes Leopard 2A4s are dubbed as 2A4TR.
Well, there was this thing.
EuroPower Pack one is missing if I’m not wrong. Either way, I’m not really fan of whole trialed vehicles idea.
As an event vehicle it would be okay addition if you ask me. When Ukrainian Tech Tree gets added, it could end up there as well. That being said I do agree that Yatağan is a sweet machine.
Even if Yatağan never comes to Turkish Tech Tree, we still have few comparable stuff to compensate.
T-72KAE (Early/2016)
T-72KAE (Late/2018)
T-72B (TFCS) Early/Prototype
T-72B (TFCS)
Fr tho, why hasn’t the Polish and Turkish TT been implemented yet? I hope we won’t have to wait until Gaijin gets bored enough to start adding these tech trees. And I’d HATE to see them as sub trees.
greece and turkey got guessed and said that will not be together so greece is going to Israel, turkey were? the only logical is germany or italy but both of them arleady have subtrees so were? (happy new year to all)
Slotted badly into the US, maybe? I think the only other semi reasonable option is the Korean tree (and I’m not a fan of that idea, but whatever), but that may not even be coming in 2026 anyway.
korea is logical with all the joint turkish and south korea stuff but in usa?? nahhh i would never see that USA dosent need leo2 and altays or eurofigthers
Said source had massive blunders for previous leaks such as ASEAN to China (Japan took Malay and Thailand), SK to Japan, NK to China, Iran to Russia etc. which all turned out to be wrong on the past years. That is why we do not consider it as a legit take since Gaijin was also hesitant to speak about the fate of Turkey unlike Greece.
Oh for sure, the US doesn’t need it at all. But an argument can be made for it. Lots of American Cold War tanks and derivatives.
I would rather not have a sub tree in the US. So many domestic options, we just don’t need it. Besides, I’ve been waiting for LAV-25’s, offensively armed HMMWV’s and Jeeps, I would get extremely irritated if we were to get a sub tree, which would be mostly copy paste, before any of these additions.
It’s gotta be the U.S. tree if not Italy.
im quite sure Smin said that they consider the nation’s defence industries (current,past, & future potential) before deciding on whether it’ll be a subtree or not
Presumably thats why Turkey hasnt been implemented at a significant amount just yet, since there’s quite a lot of stuff thats possible to be added compared to other nations, which is why i believe it can stand on its own as an independent tree
Imagine Turkey under Israel lol.
Israel TT has a lot of space tho, but I can already see the rage in the forum
Well while Greece is consideration of under Israel by Gaijin, Turkey won’t be in Israel as ‘unlikely in the same main tree’
Possibility would be Germany or USA, while later one can make Turkey more presence in main tree than earlier.
Well there its a possibility israel gets japan treatment, with more than 1 subtree.
Yeah maybe USA, Germany highly doubt because they are gonna receive swizz ground vehicles and not gonna have space for more subtrees.
