And yes if trying to find a good balancing solution is wrong, I don’t want to be right. I’ll die on that hill
At this point I’m convinced if I tried to argue the B-52 should get every buff, be br 4.0 with a 20 megaton nuclear warhead, supersonic speeds, and be a premium…
You lot would argue against that lol. Well maybe not, you all seemingly can’t stop being biased. And see the fact of the matter is the TU-95 needs to have a bigger gap between it and the B-52, because the B-52 is better in many ways.
Nobody, literal nobody would let you bomb all 7 base in B-52H
When you have
-3 other bombers and some nasty soviet strikers which want to destroy base. majorities of them are faster or have better airspawns.
-Tons of interceptors which want to see you get f… ed.
Also, I told here earlier, if you carry more bombs than 25k dmg, your base reward multiplier gets cut drastically.
Haven’t you ever flown with a B-29 or a Tu-4? Both of them can destroy four bases at once, but the reward per base is a lot lower than IL-28 with four 500kg bombs.
IF B-52H is really better because of a higher payload.
Why Buccanner and Lincoln, which can carry 15 1000lb in total, and Tonka IDS with 11x 1000lb cannot be meta?
Tonka has a drastically heavier payload than both F-111C/F and damn MiG-23s.
It just won’t fucking matter because you will get your reward doomed, and no one will let you throw all of your bombs into seven bases in a single sortie.
Man, seriously? This is a false equivalence.
BMPT is meta, B-52H isn’t meta. simple.
AND B-52H needs to be 8.3, while B-66B needs to be 8.7 in the same measure.
All of B-52H and Tu-95, and Tu-4 has similar problem.
I just can’t get why the hell you want to be ass to B-52H exclusively.
About this part, if you have a proper usable source, bugreport it, then we all in the community might be able to help you.
unless you are constantly stabbing others with verbal, and turn your potential allies into enemies.
Just let all of us have proper sources, then the majority might help you.
as long as it is historically accurate.
It is way better than fake nuke.
If we consider your spec difference claim, “Far worse in every category” is true just for arguing’s sake
Then, can you tell us why Tornado GR.1(11.7) and MiG-23ML/MLA/MLD (11.7) share the same BR?
MiG-23 is better in every category in ARB, including the base bombing role.
In the context of Air RB, the majority of the spec differences are invalid, so those 0.3BR gaps are fine.
And about Air Sim, do you know that every gamemode can have a different BR?
If we need to buff Tu-95M, we also need to buff B-52H, in the same measure.
Both share the same problem. being worthless, non meta. As almost all of the strategic bombers in War Thunder do.
From B-17, till B-29/Tu-4.
and will be followed with B-52H/Tu-95M, and Tornado IDS/Su-24.
Excuse me, but what the f
Find a good balancing solution itself isn’t bad. but problem is, you are not finding good balancing solutions. others counterargued why your POV can be wrong, but you just skipped those as ‘woo weee nato mains’
Of course we will. B-52H in lower BR than B-17?
Sounds like projection.
False, B-52H is better than Tu-95M in many ways, but almost all of them are invalid, so gap can be that small.
We need to seek solution for both, not killing one to save another.
Neither are in a good spot right now is the point we are trying to illustrate and wanting to buff one but nerf the other isn’t helping your case also you need to find proper sources that gaijin would accept
Not anymore, becaue If Gaijin revert AI gunner change
Then no fighter players will able to shoot Be-6, Tu-4 down with guns.
If we think about Gaijin’s stance (bit of russian bias, bit of US bias, and tons of Fighter bias), AI gunner will not be good.
So adding AI bomber and form wing is nice idea but cannot solve the grand problem.
And back to original topic,
Just asking.
Do you still think B-52H need to be 8.7 or 9.0 when it is basically a worse B-29 in Air RB?
(It may faster and better in spec, but if we think about opponents)
You didn’t got what I meant?
I mean, we may could adjust naval RB or Air Sim’s BR
but if we just think about Air RB.
only thing the bear needs is to be easier to land. Its literally lower BR with one or two big bombs to get a kill easier. Problem is that unlike B52 you dont have a drag chute nor do you have airbrakes to really slow down yourself fast and break your wings. It doesnt need a small yield nuclear bomb what the f*ck are you thinking.
Btw this was the result of me bombing the enemy airfield in sim. As you can see, it didn’t do jack. Literally didn’t even Yellow the runway. And they were direct hits btw.
