What’s the difference between them and gbus?
Ingame it would essentially give the A-200C the same capability as Paveway IVs
1 Like
Plus I hope they fix the livery issue in cockpit view, which you see the IDS 1982 camo livery on your IDS MLU RET.8
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/P4gBwdqsttSZ
the matter is still pending. my report was accepted, but it’s not due Lizard bombs will come. let’s hope.
1 Like
the Lizard bombs in-game on the Brazilian AMX are laser guided only though.
Would the MLU use another version?
The bombs on the A-200C would be the lizard 4 kit fitted to normal mk 82 bombs
Sorry for intruding in this long thread,but please,don t give us false hope for our tonka
Any news?i just unlocked that baby and i m crying seeing how copypasted they made my little boy
It was on the dev server. BOZ-102EC pods with MAWS and iirc 200x CMs per pod. Dev server is closed so cant go double check it.
Gunna be the only 11.7 worthy Tonka in game. Might need to grind the italian tree next
Ty man,its been neglected for so long no youtubers posted it,and i didn t play the dev
Any news for the ER version of the bombs?
I dont know. Dont think so. But not an aircraft was really actively keeping an eye on, just noted it in the dev stream
Thank you nontheless for the news
It will make it unique at least
Hopefully they ll update the RWR too,since it s one of the things that were reported
The RWR is wrong?
Though still a very good RWR for the BR.
I m not a technical guy like the lads before me,but both platforms of thonkas,the 2008 and 1995 counterpart, has the same stats,like they copypasted it
Both 1995 and mlu ret 8 (2008) mounts the ARI 23284
Unfortunately i didn t find any news over any rwr change, even cheching ret6 e ret7
The only think made public is a different IFF
Most likely a software update so that it recognises newer radars rather than a new RWR per-say. But could be wrong. Though the most modern Tonka in game the Tornado GR4 still uses the same RWR in game, which isnt surprising because its a very good RWR and replacing it would probably be more expense than it was worth. Especially with the Tonka being largely replaced by the Typhoon for both naitons
I think the main buff for the MLU specifically would be different loadout options like GPS guided Lizard bombs.
After that, its more general Tonka fixes or weapon related fixes such as:
- Finished FM
- Combat Thrust
- Radar modeled
- Sky Shadow ECM
- ASMs?
- ARMs
- CBUs
- GBU-39 GPS accuracy
- Even something relatively minor like 495 Gal drop tanks
1 Like
All tornados currently have the same designation as the original British RWR.
In reality the early tornados (Tornado MFG and Tornado IDS (IT)) should have the ERWE or ARWE RWR. These are both the same as the British designation, just differed for different countries.
Tornado IDS 1995 should have the RWR-90, which it was upgraded to shortly before Desert Storm.
Lastly the A-200C should have the AR-3 or AR-3C radar which is heavily modernized, even the ingame cockpit of the A-200C has a RWR section modelled, but it isnt fully function because the RWR is still the 1980s British. From the looks of it the AR-3 would combine the Russian type of RWR where you can see if the target is above or below, and also still have the nato type where you can see from every direction.
It still shows the GBU-62 in the LJDAM section on the live and dev server, same with GBU-64 on live and dev server. The aircraft still lacks the weapons on both servers.
I dont think a bug report was made for this yet. Ill get around to it eventually as well as some other bug reports that still haven’t been made
Ah cool. Then maybe some day they’ll model that :D
New bug on the tornado MLU,mk83 1000lb bombs can’t be bombed over mach 1 speed,at any wing angle,tested now in match
Its been like that for over a year. With few exceptions, all bombs have a Mach 1 drop limit. Its on the stat cards
guess it s a bug it still works on the base tornado…sorry fam,i ll delete if necessary to keep the thread clean
Not strictly off topic so its fine, but GR1/GR4 at the very least its the same. Should be all of them. So yeah, if the base italian IDS isnt affected, that would be the bug