Communication has ALWAYS been gaijins biggest failure. So yeah, its nice to have gotten an explanation (though I think it oculd have been worded better)
6 Likes
Is it different from 2? And the one from the UK
Now imagine if the KH38MT could be fired from behind a mountain without ever having to aim it or showing the plane to the AA.
LOAL ARH is sooooo much worse. Like, its not even a question.
7 Likes
I understand they said it will take a few seasons but you could put them in the game just have them work the same way spikes currently work. There’s no counter for these long range fire and forget, but unless you have a laser detection on your tank, you dont know laser guided atgm is about to hit you, and unless you are an spaa with your radar turned on you wont see the tv guided atgm coming to you unless you happen to look at the right time and are able to smoke and move. I really dont see why the brimstone cant be fire and forget now as it would not really be anything different than the game play we have now. Same goes for the hellfire longbow
2 Likes
Even thought the explanation made zero sense considering both the Panstir and the KH38 are in the game? Seems like a slap in the face more than anything and suggests the devs don’t play their own game.
10 Likes
SO what do you think NATO SPAA against KH38MT?
These SU25SM3 lunch KH38MT at 15km even far away. And NATO SPAA only have 12km range,
Russian SPAA gets 18km range and you told your players adding the weapon like KH38MT will be not balanced.
Could you be more detailed?
28 Likes
So another weapon system which cannot be fully implemented because of reasons.
Perhaps Gaijin should focus more work on updating the game so we can have those systems without artificial limitations.
But no, quota for new vehicles needs to be met at all costs, even if it means to add half baked vehicles without half of their features.
5 Likes
i would give em 2 hours in top tier ground RB and they would tear their hair out
Happy birthday
Why would you remove the only decent spaa tho?
Do you want cas to be even more gamebreakingly op?
God damn Britain going to be clearing the ground with this one.
1 Like
It seems like Gaijin’s trolls are trying to mislead them with unreasonable excuses. WELL DONE.
Far less powerful than the Su-25SM3 and F-16C in that regard and significantly more vulnerable than the F16C
There’s your reason. Either better implementation across all nations or remove the one odd ball out.
5 Likes
Gaijin needs to add way better spaa systems in order for stuff like that to be fully added.
It wouldn’t be fun, fair, or a balanced otherwise.
Or they just stop adding top tier stuff to focus on lower BRs, but that will never happen.
1 Like
Well, I think that after something like that, any reasonable UK main will just ignore this, um, “game”.
2 Likes
Can we consider in the game not a blind launch from behind cover, but shooting through a POD with the ability to “release” the missile after launching according to the laser target designation, so that it can then “catch” on to its radar?
this is good and all, but what about a potential teaser?
Personally i don’t see the comparison.
That’s like saying adding AIM-120 to a 10.0 BR plane wouldn’t be OP because we already have really good SARH missiles at that BR.
It doesn’t really logically track. Just because there already exists something that some consider overpowered, doesn’t mean that other additions can’t be even more overpowered than that.
If i over-exaggerate just to make it clear what i mean: “I have a knife, my enemy has a pistol so he’s already overpowered, so why can’t i have the 500kg bomb to even it out?”
3 Likes
All sm3s do is spam all 4 missiles and then die. A better spaa wouldn’t change much in this case