Deleting comments that fairly criticise your decisions ain’t a way to look all that flash.
Why does your balance team fail to account for survivorship bias? It is a valid question.
Deleting comments that fairly criticise your decisions ain’t a way to look all that flash.
Why does your balance team fail to account for survivorship bias? It is a valid question.
Comments are removed when they break forum rules and contain insults to the Devs.
It’s more than possible to make a post without them and refrain from rule breaks.
Being critical is fine. Insults are not.
They were completely valid questions. Are you sure that your balance department has the training needed to account for the data they are handling? Because the outcomes are incredibly unfavourable to that conclusion based on their actions. If the outcomes weren’t so unfavourable, I would not be questioning this but every step of the way there’s incredibly questionable decisions claimed to be “based on statistics”.
Implication =/= statement.
Your post =/= you.
So no one rewrote anyone’s statement.
Stating that a post implies something IS NOT and has NEVER been stating the person OR post stated something.
So as I said in the first sentence: Implication is not a synonym of statement.
@Flogger_cbs
You mean my what seems to be a 2:1 KDR:
can brimstones get something like the gps guide,i mean very correct iog.
the brimstones can do this in reality
They do not have this in SAL mode.
too many aircraft have radically different BRs to identical versions, It is becoming a concern.
Like the B-26, AMX, Hunters and Tornado IDS are all examples of this
You have two planes in the game: the F-111F and the F-111C. Am I correct in understanding that these planes have the same effectiveness in ARB and ASB, and that’s why they are at the same BR?
Which is my entire point, but apparently highlighting it snarkily when it is an incredibly valid concern is breaking the rules.
fine I’ll rephrase it more professionally.
It is a statistical fallacy to place the WTD61, MFG, and A200 at 11.3 when stat for stat they are identical to the IDS and GR1 barring the Laser Guided Bombs which have no impact on the performance of the aircraft in Air Combat.
Not only does Air RB frequently have mixed battles meaning the Ground RB reasoning of “they fight different threats” doesn’t apply here. But the WTD61 (a premium for one of the most popular nations in the game), and the MFG (an event plane for one of the most popular nations in the game) will obviously perform worse statistically than the IDS/GR1 which require you to actually work your way towards and its implied are used by slightly better players.
However statistically the A-200 performs better than the WTD61 and MFG, so why is it 11.3… well the reason is simple, because if it got moved up to 11.7 it’d make any argument for the IDS/MFG being 11.3 fall apart more than it already does.
I understand balancing the same vehicle differently in GRB (at times) because of what these vehicles face when in certain nations. In ARB this does not matter because it’s constantly mixed.
i think brimstones’ maximum speed is too low,does it reall?current in the game its even lower than agm114k
Or even A2G combat (in ARB) as they all have CCIP, Even if you target AI tanks, you get more score dropping 12x Unguided bombs with CCIP than you get from dropping 4x laser guided bombs. Its likely a lot safer to do that too.
Please do not twist things. Staff insults were the rule break and all what the problem is here. You have been warned for it and the post removed. That’s all. Please simply take note moving forward.
It’s useless it doesn’t even get fire and forget dead on arrival if you make it laser fire and forget it’s gone be ok or make it TV guided.
I mean that with 143 respawns, you have only 88 destroyed targets. I’m not really interested in your other excuses. For a supposed CAS king and ‘Pantsir’s terror,’ this looks unconvincing. Also, could you clarify how many flights you have on the Su-25SM3? I’m curious how many battles it took for you to conclude that the Kh-38 and the Mav are equivalent.
dont worry the brimstone is so good the US Stream didn’t even try to show it off, they glossed over it and moved onto Paveway IVs.
The game doesn’t count base bombings for one.
Second, ~15 matches were bringing one bomb to attempt the 20km achievement prior to the GPS bomb announcement.
Should I repeat the question? Alright. Сould you clarify how many flights you have on the Su-25SM3? I’m curious how many battles it took for you to conclude that the Kh-38 and the Mav are equivalent.
No, they are gone be shit if they are not fire and forget that’s why they are dead on arrival