i think brimstones’ maximum speed is too low,does it reall?current in the game its even lower than agm114k
Or even A2G combat (in ARB) as they all have CCIP, Even if you target AI tanks, you get more score dropping 12x Unguided bombs with CCIP than you get from dropping 4x laser guided bombs. Its likely a lot safer to do that too.
Please do not twist things. Staff insults were the rule break and all what the problem is here. You have been warned for it and the post removed. That’s all. Please simply take note moving forward.
It’s useless it doesn’t even get fire and forget dead on arrival if you make it laser fire and forget it’s gone be ok or make it TV guided.
I mean that with 143 respawns, you have only 88 destroyed targets. I’m not really interested in your other excuses. For a supposed CAS king and ‘Pantsir’s terror,’ this looks unconvincing. Also, could you clarify how many flights you have on the Su-25SM3? I’m curious how many battles it took for you to conclude that the Kh-38 and the Mav are equivalent.
dont worry the brimstone is so good the US Stream didn’t even try to show it off, they glossed over it and moved onto Paveway IVs.
The game doesn’t count base bombings for one.
Second, ~15 matches were bringing one bomb to attempt the 20km achievement prior to the GPS bomb announcement.
Should I repeat the question? Alright. Сould you clarify how many flights you have on the Su-25SM3? I’m curious how many battles it took for you to conclude that the Kh-38 and the Mav are equivalent.
No, they are gone be shit if they are not fire and forget that’s why they are dead on arrival
Not much insult in justifiably questioning something in a snarky way. They were all valid questions about the training of the team that is responsible for these choices. Because the decisions the balance teams are making lead me to assume they have either not been given the training, or the time, to make well reasoned balance changes.
And I would like a response to this. Are your balance teams lacking training, or lacking the provisions to do their job properly? Because there are many instances of balancing that you justify with “the statistics said as much” but if we compare the things, they should either be at the same rating or inverse to how your organisation decides to balance them.
It is upsetting that data that has clearly not been sanitised appropriately is being used to create poor outputs. It isn’t hard to see the issues your balancing approach creates, so why does it keep happening instead of updating procedure?
I just checked this f**ker in game, guess what, he didn’t have su-25sm.
None, cause I’ve used the type of missiles Su-25SM3 has and I don’t really care about a subsonic CAS again. I also don’t want another Su-25 in general.
I have the Harrier GR7 if I want the Su-25SM3 experience right now.
Launch AGM-65Gs at 4 people, RTB fly up again do it again.
I did it with AGM-65Ds prior.
So to sum up
The 3x Tornados at 11.3 (A200, MFG and WTD61) have 100% identical performance and ARB loadouts to that of the 3x Tornados at 11.7 (GR1, ASSTA1 and A200A) (im choosing to just ignore the minor differences on the GR1 for ease of conversation but the pro/cons of the aircraft mitigate these differences enough to just ignore the differences for now)
No explanation on exactly how the addition of a tpod or laser guided bombs massively increase effeciency was provided
Therefore in the summer, we’re planning to give more clarification and bring this issue up for discussion — whether or not we should reduce the rewards for bases in order to reduce the Battle Rating of aircraft that mainly bomb bases, or leave everything as it is now. Please follow the news for more details on this.
This thread has never appeared to challenge this and attempts to get an answer or clarification on this issue were ignored in the last BR change.
All 6 Tonado IDSs need to be at 11.3 or a reason to have them at different BRs needs to be added. Such as giving them Aim-9Li (which I do not beleive would require a BR different to that of 11.7)
(as it stands I already think too much emphasis is put on what these aircraft can do not what they will do, yes the Tornado can kill 2x bases per match, but they wont even necessarily get 1x base kill every single match, 2 is rarer still)
As for the Torando GR4. The upgrades do constitute a higher BR than 11.3, obviously, but I struggle to place it at 12.0 let alone 12.3.
It is still a Tornado IDS, it is still an 11.3 airframe. HMD wont suddenly mean it will survive a dogfight with an F-16 or Mig-29, etc. Its New A2G wont suddenly make it win matches on score alone (in fact i suspect in ARB, 99% will run the same loadout as they do on the Gr1) As a net gain, the BR increase will harm it far more than the things gained.
When you couple with the lack of 12.3 brackets in sim especially, meaning like the Harrier Gr7 and others at 12.3 It can only play 12.7 or higher, this means it will be directly facing some of the best aircraft in the game on a regular basis. In again, a fairly weak 11.3 airframe given some minor defensive upgrades.
you underestimate gaijins ability to ignore anything that doesn’t help America or Russia.
I’m more impressed how they could hold a straight face saying the GR4 would be “too good” while dropping the Su-34 and F-15E the same update.
Oh no! AGM-65s and KH-38s are still OP!
If only they’d add SPAA superior to Pantsir to all 10 tech trees… oh wait, their stats say people are dying to SPAA still cause not enough people fly CAS with survival in mind.
Me begging for better SPAA, and also me begging that CAS players learn how to survive.
Whilst if the Gripen gets GBU 39s, it would outperform the Gr4 in a strike role.
Kh-38 is entirely different to what Brimstone would be. This is not a good comparison at all.
It seems rather DOA with the Brimestone not being added it it’s full capability. And it’s a bit wild we haven’t seen ARH missiles yet. Would be nice to have something to at least scare the OP as hell Pantsir.