Topic about Japan adds t84 and vt4

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

2 Likes

why should they? that doesnt hurt anyone, just more combinations

3 Likes

It’s not coming on September 3rd brother. In fact it’s not even coming in this update. Please spread this fact in the chinese internet if you can, it seems many chinese player don’t know the latest official statement regarding thai VT4.
Sub trees are basically nations within nation. They are kind of independent. Just because a host tech tree gets a sub tree that doesn’t mean that sub tree’s vehicles are now owned by the host tech tree.

It doesn’t hurt me, but what about the Chinese? They say they don’t want the Thai VT-4 to have a Japanese decal on it, but people can already do this with the Chinese ZTZ-99A and other chinese vehicles in the Chinese tech tree.

4 Likes

so. they shouldnt change anything then - it’s already fine as it is.

2 Likes

Youre expecting too much logic here. Its not a logical converation its not a reasonable conversation. Its a converation about hate, nationalism and ww2.

The fact gaijin entertains this at all is stupid

1 Like

The core problem is people being dumb and unreasonable.

The reason why people dont want eastern european vehicles in the ussr tech tree is becayse there is no real reason to do so. The ussr tech tree is massive, the tanks are completely unrelated besides ancestral bond. A way more reasonable choice would be a united tt, as many of the nations composing it are nato members in the first place.
For an asian tech tree its a different story natuons vary massively and realistically have very little to offer. China essentially has already a subtree thailand going to japan makes sense from a game pov, a united asian tt would very little to offer and would be a bad addition imi

Dont bring stupid politics into this.

1 Like

It was sold and exported to Thailand. “VT4” is not unique to china.

7 Likes

Yeah some has been divoiced already and we will continue to do so if the thread drifts in Wrong direction.

2 Likes

Racism both ways is NOT tolerated. Stop with this disgusting behavior already, we’ve been quite clear.

5 Likes

I am another Thai player and I can assume more than 90% of Thai players love and prefer to be the sub tree of Japan and if you’re not believe me I can send you the War Thunder Thailand Community and you can join there and ask all the Thai people there what do they think. Are you brave enough?

9 Likes

Then what is the point of having Pakistan there in the first place???

The topic is about T84 - VT-4. Please keep to those vehicles.

3 Likes

This topic is political from the very start and should be removed, and yet the only thing removed are being comments which are “political”.

There are plenty of vehicle that shouldn’t be where they are right now because of politics and yet they are where they are because that’s where they fit the best at the moment.

In addition as far as I know VT-4 is primarly an export vehicle meaning it’s gonna end up in other nations.

Thailand as far as I know is NOT Japan, they are PART of their tech-tree because JP literally lacks vehicles post WWII and this is partially the role of Thailand, to give Thai players their nation vehicles and to increase the overall volume of available vehicles in Japan.

I’m pretty sure in the stats card there’s gonna be a Thai flag, not JP flag, crew voices are gonna be Thai not JP.

If VT-4 an export vehicle for Thailand will not be added to JP tech tree then Taiwan vehicles should be removed from Chinese tech tree as well and moved to another.

10 Likes

I agree with this part. But I also think Gaijin is not clear enough about this. A lot of times I see people think a subtree is some form of lesser nation belonging to another, rather than two equally important nations in a mutually beneficial system.
This is an issue with how subtrees are represented right now, and something I think needs fixing regardless of this controversy.

If anything, I think Gaijin should see this situation as pointing out key flaws in the current inplementation of subtrees and maybe consider reworking their implementation. I made a whole suggestion about it myself, and I know I am not the first. There was a similar suggestion on the old forum by another player and many ideas for improvements from other players as well.
This might be the time for Gaijin to think about how to address these issues.

9 Likes

Playing the Thai A-7E in sim today made this very obvious, it’s a VERY capable plane and complements the F-1 and 104J perfectly.
I expect similar from the Thai ground subtree and the T-84 and VT4.

Please keep all communication in this section of the forums in English only, and completely avoid discussion of current conflicts or other political agitation.

3 Likes

pretty much an improvement to the modern T series tanks in every way except maybe fire power

The Type 90’s and TKX’s are already some of the strongest in the game and looked over quite a lot. Not to mention their extremely inaccurate armor profiles, having much more than in game.

I don’t feel the VT or 84 is needed…