This is also a problem. A Sub-tree nation (for example Thailand) DOESN’T MEAN IT’S BELOW THE MAIN NATION (Japan).
It doesn’t mean that Thailand (sub-tree nation) is a vassal-state, a colony, a protectorate. It’s just where gaijin puts that country. Thailand’s (sub-tree nation) importance is the same as Japan’s.
Putting VT4 into Thai sub-tree DOESN’T MAKE VT4 japanese.
Or perhaps Japan has participated in the VT4 cooperation
So you call the apple in the orange box as orange?
THAILAND. THAILAND BOUGHT IT. THAILAND OPERATES IT. IT BELONGS IN THAI SUB-TREE.
Most important thing chinese players miss is that THIS DOESN’T MEAN THAILAND IS UNDER JAPAN.
Like I said above:
Thailand SHARES the tree with Japan. It’s not Thailand below Japan. All sub-tree nations should be of equal importance. Sub-trees are just where gaijin puts smaller nations that can’t make their own entire tree. That doesn’t mean they are less or beneath main nations.
That is why T84 and VT4 is going to THAILAND.
“Do not discuss politics.”
You brought them up first, why do you have a problem with it now? I also don’t think this can even count as strictly political because it has relevance to the VT-4 and T-84’s placement in game.
This is why we need a rework of the Subtree system so Japan is instead a “Folder Nation” rather than the “Research Tree”. It’d allow for Thai vehicles to be separate from Japanese vehicles in the tree while allowing shared lineups. And it wouldn’t cause such a conundrum when the vehicles like the VT-4 are added because they can be controversial for some people.
“We agree to include the VT4 in the game, but it must not appear in the Japan line—that’s the only condition.”
The customers buy the seller’s product and do the customer have it’s right to do anything with the product it buy or the customer that bought product still have no rights at all to do with the product it bought, is it all the the seller’s right? Is it fair?
Okay it won’t it will be in the Thai line.
Honestly, I can’t comprehend why this topic goes around and around the same subjects for gazillion’s time, just with different actors in this thread.
Are we supposed to be receiving a Japanese VT-4? No, its Thai. Thailand shares the tree with Japan. It’ll likely function like every other Ground subtree- all will be in a line. A Thai line.
Because its from different players with the same intentions. New ones will surely come here.
Please understand that this doesn’t mean it’s under japan like i said.
Is this that hard to understand? If you can’t understand this basic statement, then there is no use of further debate.
passes time, gives me an excuse to nerd out about certain vehicles and militaries
im also excited for the Thai vehicles to be added, kicking my legs behind my head like a little girl
I will ask you, are you brave enough to join War Thunder Thailand Community and ask all the Thai players there do they like to be part of Japan or not?
clearly no Thai player wants the VT-4 in Japan, hence why the only Thai people here are happy to see it or are making a decent case for it.
Not only this. Ask Thai players where they want THAI TANKS to be.
If you don’t you’re scared or you are hypocrite. Wanting people to listen to you but not listen to Thai players.
most responses I see is Japan (current) or ASEAN tree (future)
If you haven’t joined the group and asked the opinions of the Thai players who own it, you will continue to be illogical and believe that the apple in the orange box is an orange.
