As we have already mentioned, the “Rumor” is false.
A VT-4 for the Thai sub tree is not coming this major update around September at all.
3 Likes
Just want to say, the most Chinese community is not here just because it’s 0:00 AM- 14:56 PM workday since the posts are posted, and because of the bad English…
So you’ve decided to implement the VT-4 for Japan after all, right?
2 Likes
Any personal attacks on anyone due to what there nationality could be or is will get you time off and depending on the severity of the attack a Ban!
It will not be tolerated at all!
4 Likes
Thanks for your clarification again, actually that message was well spread in the community yesterday night here (GMT+8). what concerns most of us is the probability of adding it in the future despite the promise of no China-made vehicles in the Japan TT.
We have not mentioned any such rule or promise. We always talk about our current plans.
6 Likes
For reference, please read:
2 Likes
When did the authorities ever make that promise?
never
Maybe other official menbers carries the wrong info, but last year’s clarification WAS once a relief:
Because after Thai Air Tree was added to Japan TT, at that time already, concerns about adding VT-4 in the future in the Japan TT had raised wide concern until this clairfication.
7 Likes
This is a forum, not a place for you to arbitrarily label people. Please stick to the facts.
No plans or ideas
meaning once they have an idea/plan to add something they’ll most likely do it
they didnt explicitly say “No chinese tanks for japan”
2 Likes
Yes, that is the correct interpretation.
I can’t elaborate extensively, but I can affirm that the following segments of your statement are widely agreed upon and rationally sound (marked with ✅):
✅ “…the first sentence，the third sentence, fourth sentence, sixth sentence, and all subsequent sentences are widely agreed upon and rationally sound.”
❌ “The remaining perspectives may not be entirely accurate, or could stem from unaccessed information.”
✅ “If you’re interested, further research is recommended.”
A little bit off-topic, but at this rate, should Gaijin bring back the Tencent server less sensitive game version as an optional setting for everyone?
Like currently we can enable or disable historical content only in settings
IIRC they replaced IRL flags and roundels with fictional one (Not sure if the vehicle name also changed or not, last time I observed on Tencent server was in 2017).
For example, entire JP air tree got replaced with fancy skins and Hinomaru roundel got replaced with Raijin symbol.
It’s kinda cool tho and probably less offended.
4 Likes
So, what exactly is your demand?
I don’t demand, I convey thoughts and ideas of the majority Chinese community
for reference:
1 Like
Reminder, this is English speaking forum, please use English language only.
Thanks.
Chinese speaking section of our forum is located here:
4 Likes
I added both ENG and CN (and gave a translator i used to translate ENG → CN/CN → ENG to make it easier for them to communicate in the eng forum if they wanted to convey their msg here)
bit sad to see that bit removed but it is what it is
The use of any language other than English is prohibited.
If we will allow bi-lingual posts, soon™ we will have posts with 4-5 languages mixed, no one will understand other side and there will be end of regular discussion. Please try to write posts in English that can be understood.
Thank you for understanding.
6 Likes
But these views are all proposed by you. Even within the Chinese community, there is a lot of disagreement, so you cannot claim to represent the entire Chinese community.
3 Likes