Nothings being erased
It’s just a sub tree
And I can sympathise with you and your nation
Since I also come from a region that was heavily affected
I think it’s best that if the vt4 is added to the Thai sub tree
It’s done in a way that doesn’t blatantly disregard your sentiment
I agree
But I’m all for other nations getting USA exports
Alright guys calm down, mods still exist, hopefully, i’ll materialize them if they don’t already exist.
Day 2 overtime I see haha
I would clarify here, we have vehicles like the Hunter F.58, which have no developement or operational ties to Germany but belong to the Swiss sub tree.
We have the Indian T-90S, Strella and OSA, which have have no developement or operational ties to Britain but belong to the indian sub tree.
We have the BeNeLux Leopards, which have no developement or operational ties to France but belong to the BeNeLux sub tree.
The list of examples go on, but the very point of sub trees is to diversify and expand options, lineups and gameplay within the game. Its never been a requirement for the nation a sub tree is added inside to have operationally used a vehicle or been involved in its development.
Just better not cause controversies…
For reference:
As we have already mentioned, the “Rumor” is false.
A VT-4 for the Thai sub tree is not coming this major update around September at all.
Just want to say, the most Chinese community is not here just because it’s 0:00 AM- 14:56 PM workday since the posts are posted, and because of the bad English…
So you’ve decided to implement the VT-4 for Japan after all, right?
Any personal attacks on anyone due to what there nationality could be or is will get you time off and depending on the severity of the attack a Ban!
It will not be tolerated at all!
Thanks for your clarification again, actually that message was well spread in the community yesterday night here (GMT+8). what concerns most of us is the probability of adding it in the future despite the promise of no China-made vehicles in the Japan TT.
We have not mentioned any such rule or promise. We always talk about our current plans.
For reference, please read:
When did the authorities ever make that promise?
never
Maybe other official menbers carries the wrong info, but last year’s clarification WAS once a relief:
Because after Thai Air Tree was added to Japan TT, at that time already, concerns about adding VT-4 in the future in the Japan TT had raised wide concern until this clairfication.
This is a forum, not a place for you to arbitrarily label people. Please stick to the facts.
No plans or ideas
meaning once they have an idea/plan to add something they’ll most likely do it
they didnt explicitly say “No chinese tanks for japan”
Yes, that is the correct interpretation.
I can’t elaborate extensively, but I can affirm that the following segments of your statement are widely agreed upon and rationally sound (marked with ✅):
✅ “…the first sentence，the third sentence, fourth sentence, sixth sentence, and all subsequent sentences are widely agreed upon and rationally sound.”
❌ “The remaining perspectives may not be entirely accurate, or could stem from unaccessed information.”
✅ “If you’re interested, further research is recommended.”