Nobody is trying to provoke the Chinese. The Thai people used this vehicle, so they deserve it in the game. Adding a Thai vehicle outside of the tree they share with Japan is out of the question- When a country becomes a subtree, they stay there. Israeli vehicles haven’t gone anywhere else since they became a tree, same with Italian and Swedish vehicles. *For a better example, South Africa had a vehicle in Germany but then became a subtree of the UK and has since not had any vehicles go to any other tree. The Superhind could’ve easily gone to Russia as an upgraded Mi-24.
And why would they want the VT-4 to come to the Thai subtree just to provoke Chinese players? If they really wanted to provoke the Chinese community, then they’d go shit-talk you, not call for the Thai people to receive their MBT.
And the VT-4 is not an asset of the Chinese military- they’ve never used it! It’s not even in service! 3 countries and their militaries use it, the Chinese do not.
Nothing is complicated. Thailand is not “under” Japan. To say that Japan should not get this vehicle, is saying Thailand should not get this vehicle. They share a tree. Nothing is complicated here, a Thai vehicle should go to Thailand. Japan is a sideline topic.
The poll was on Tieba.
And it doesn’t need to be large scale to support accurate assumptions. Scientists use sample sizes of 1000 to come to conclusions for populations in the millions.
Eh, depends on Gaijin, the CV90120 is pretty good on Sweden at 11.7 but gaijin seems to have moved away from trial vehicles after the T80 U situation. Imo it would be better than the VT-4 super mobile, 5s autoloader, 600mm pen round.
I wouldn’t get my hopes up as a replacement given the current stance on trial vehicles. Especially given it will cause more people to argue about trial vehicles.
Well 2 things bring all this good meat I mean information to the ASIAN sub tree discussion and make a poll here so we can show Gaijin the forms totally work at solving disputes ;-). We did it guys we have a solution to the VT-4!
