It would’ve been an m1a1 sa, but regardless no Abrams was knocked out by a Russian tank, that was misinformation with no evidence behind it. Much like when the challenger 2 was knocked out by lancet, kornet, t90m, t72, then FPV and then mines or artillery. It’s just a destroyed tank which people just attribute whatever they want the kill.
as far as i know all individuals walked away
To say that drones aren’t very common is peak, yes i not gonna try
2 Likes
i hear conflicting statements about that often so idk
I didn’t say that
that challenger that was atomised in kursk was hit by a bloody big bomb whatever it was. the first one was disabled by a mine and then scuttled by the crew though.
It was hit by a mine(or artillery) and finished off later with a kornet. Probably peppered by fps too. Entire crew survived which means it did it’s job…
The second also was finished off later but not much is known about the series of events
Sounds like a joke
1 Like
It sounds like lack of reading comprehension.
its debated whether the kornet did finish it off or the crew scuttled beforehand. either way the tank was a lost and the armour worked.
the “official” footage might as well have been filmed on a 3ds and shown to everyone on a $20 mp4 player from 2006 with how low quality it is so we wont ever know
1 Like
The damage supports the use of a missile
It’s uncanny how similar it is to my 3ds camera really
1 Like
yes
I’m talking about your statement that drones are not common.
it was hit by a missile.
but the footage of the hit doesnt confirm if it was the finisher or if it was finished off before.
As are most tanks, but it must be doing a lot right if western tanks all copied the design. But changing some elements
2 Likes
This comment makes no sense. Only one factory was building T-14s meaning they were the same standard.
The T-14 Armata tank’s serial production was managed by Uralvagonzavod (UVZ) , specifically its Ural Design Bureau of Transport Machine-Building in Nizhny Tagil, Russia, but a dedicated assembly line struggled to materialize due to sanctions and funding issues
2 Likes
and russia will get the Su-30SM2 that came out 20 years after the F-22
It’s not invulnerable.
The crew capsule is 1000mm RHA UFP. I believe 800RHa LFP, and 600RHA on the sides, granted some of that is counted via era.
The round was totally resigned with the turret to accept much longer projectiles. Vacuum1 is the round it uses, which supposedly is rated for 1000mm RHA penetration. (Not sure how exact that is).
They resdesigned the transmission to allow quicker reverse, but not lack on mobility.
Honestly, I can’t wait to see the leap forward in tech more.
2 Likes