huh ??? wait give me a sec
The one where it takes one a convoy, it also disables 2 tanks in that same video
Fiber optic drones are unaffected by electronic warfare, and they are the most widely used, with drones reaching up to 8km in distance. Tanks worldwide will change; I consider drones the worst threat a tank has ever faced in its history, because a drone can precisely target the engine, tracks, weak points, and the roof, which is the weakest part.
Lancet perfomance was overstated and this days it has very limited utility in the heavy EW environment
yeah like this is not a t90m2. its a t90m with arena-m. m2 production starts next year reportedly. they will more than likely show it off when its ready especially its t14 transmission
no… on firepower the challenger 3, abrams and leopard 2 are all on par as its the same gun.
armour is basically the same
cross country performance is also near enough the same
soviet tanks are generations behind in the real world.
probably the gulf wars where T72s and older soviet stock was getting pwned by m1a1 abrams and challenger 1 at comedic ranges.
the tank has always been for infantry support, anti fortification & armour while countering anti armour and personell measures of the enemy. really nothing has changed other than the generations of technology.
What good is being in a Leopard if the drone hits its motor and when you get out there are thousands waiting for you?
Fiber optics have limited range and cannot operate in dense environents.
They’re so useful in the field because of circumstances of said conflict.
i would also love to see a more modern t90m production, maybe as a premium likely in the future. they just look so good
for now.
agreed.
1 Like
rather get the t90m2 at this point
You’re fast, you’re well protected and you’re accurate simple as
That drone that disabled your engine could’ve hit your ammo and have you atomized.
the more arena we can fit in a lineup the better
either way the tank is combat ineffective, so its a victory
The tank is expendable the crew isn’t. You cannot replace experienced crews in a month
more like t55 and t62.
How can you take seriously someone who compares Iraqi T-72As, which didn’t even have thermal vision, old APFSDs with steel penetrators, to M1A1s and Challengers 1s? Jesus Christ.
Why don’t we talk about the T72B3 that destroyed an M1A1 Abrams at Avdiivka, since it’s a modern T72B3?
1 Like
there were T72s that the americans engaged.
its also the closest we have to modern tank vs modern tank
^^
is the current war in eastern europe not the best example of tank v tank? or am i missing something in this convo
1 Like