Playing Britain low tier ground is fun when you treat assists as knocking out enemy vehicles (or just using Churchill NA75)
its a good one with decent 6pdr cannons, yes. And later on 17pdrs are good. I mean the entire tree is basically good if skip some cacti that gaijin doesn not like or want to fix (hello 4005).
I like playing Britain alot, but i see some problems at top tier
agree
Conflicted, the picture looks weird yeah. Luckily enough it’s still in one of the US museums available yo see irl.
Yet you keep up the “hurr durr everyone keeps copying the Armata” cope, acting like the Armata was the first and only one to do it.
i hate tog 2 as much as i like it. But the linup? Great one for sure!
I cant show mine as im at work but let me try something…
could not find any pics :(
I use Comet, Challenger, ACIV, Skink, Fairey Firefly and Prednergast’s Spitfire.
2 Likes
i exceeded my tog 2 game limit for a year after two sequential games of complete M O V E M E N T. I got 0 points just because TOG didnt keep up with battle xD
Yup, unfortunately it’s be a paper thin vehicle armour-wise.
1 Like
Because it’s true? And I did use to respect you… but now when you say crap like cope, now I don’t. What happened to the respectable, debatable, awesome guy known as Renzo?
As far as the proto types, they came out literally about the same time
1 Like
How?
A slight angle and you’re practically invincible, with a good cannon, and good pen.
You really only lack mobility.
That’s what I’m saying.
Ngl I’m pissed the USA is getting the m10 booker, a literal brand new tank as of 2025 that was already canceled due to weight…
1 Like
M1 TTB was developed and built in the 1980’s, far predating the T-14 (which started development around 2010).
Object 195 (or Object 477; 1980’s) also predates the T-14.
Germany also had several crewless-turret concepts far predating the T-14, such as;
EGS - Experimentalträger Gesamtschutz (1995+) [Part of NGP (Neue Gepanzerte Platform) Program] [Test-Hull without cannon]
VTS-1 - Versuchsträger Scheitellafette (Trialed in 1979) [KPz Leopard 3 program]
Related concept/proposal: KPz Leopard 3 SL (Scheitellafette) (1979)
T-14 doesnt incorporate some sort of novel concept and is by far not the first, nor only vehicle based on it.
I wouldnt consider it to be more than a prototype either, given that it 1) Isnt in large-scale production and 2) has yet to be deployed in actual combat (and confirmed to be, random claims with no evidence do not count tbh)
In that was the case than Russia and US were copying themselfs, hard for the US to need to copy the Armata when they have already done most of the things it does themselfs.
Died a while ago together with the rest of my mental health and mental stability.
1 Like
So which is it?
Did others copy the Armata? Or did several nations develope the idea at roughly the same time and independently from one another?
I was talking about how the T-14 started up, then everyone else re-leaped onto the project.
I think KF51 Panther (was)/ is getting adopted?
But I don’t think abrams x will cut it.
2 Likes
Read the reply I just posted.
Yeah I agree with this. I think they’ll take some ideas from the techdemonstrator that worked but I doubt the AbramsX in overall is going somewhere.
Especially with the electric engine / the even heavier abrams. Didn’t it weigh like 5 more tons?
Also aren’t the French doing somethingv
it was being tested or being put into service in 2025 but it wasn’t made during that time as far as i’m aware
stuff like the 2S38 was also still in testing when it was added to WT if i remember correctly
and Jaguar (IFV) was put into service just like 3-ish years ago
so it’s not anything new by WT standards
1 Like