This^
SEP V3 and T-80BVM Mod 23 can 100% be in the game by now, as long as the SEP V3 doesn’t introduce anything OP.
While it would give the US an equal to the HAMMER/KH-38, I believe this shouldn’t be added until the SPAA problem is resolved. Even then, the Mav is still 100% workable.
Mav at low tiers is still usable, but at Top Tier its literal dogshit.
It gets NGAP.
A simple answer: Armor.
It is 100% not dogshit, this is user error. If you want to learn how to use them watch this guy: https://www.youtube.com/@Kai_TG
Whats the estimated added protection?
This is literally the one advantage of the T-90M. Cherry-picking that does not make the T-90M better than the Abrams.
Swedish tanks are not the best because of their reload nor their mobility.
I need to check people that got the exact protection, but it would make the Abrams competitive against 2A7,T90M,B+.
It is dogshit compared to AASM,KH38MT,KH29…etc
Also this guy stated that if there’s a Pantsir he wouldn’t do all that.
They are the best because they combine everything. Competitive reload, good reverse, good mobility, amazing armor. The T-90M has 1 of those traits.
Then watch what he does when there is a a Pantsir.
I’d trade mobility,reload for good armor when it comes to the Abrams.
Oblivious Pantsir player.
According to some of the sources available the PW-229 engines were fitted on F-15E 90-0233 and up. Photos of this specific aircraft can already be dated back to 1993.
Regarding NGAPs armor, gaijin is going to have to make an educated guess since there are literally no figures out there since it’s highly classified. That being said, considering sepv3 was a response to the T14 Armata you can probably make a safe guestimation that it probably offers 600 KE plus armor on the hull. And that’s also based on the fact that the army in the early 90s in testing managed to get a 35% increase in KE on the m1a2s hull(550mm KE of armor) which was 30 years ago. The turret is probably close to 850mm to 1000mm KE on the turret.
Every new day brings a new amazing way for people here to moan about Russian tanks…Amazing just how much people invest their time and mind into thinking of a new way to cry about a made up story which makes themselves a victim of a non existent threat
While I do agree with the sentiment, CAS gameplay heavily leans in Russia and France’s favor.
Yes mavericks can be used in top tier but it cannot be used the same way as the Kh-38s and Hammers. For mavericks to be used effectively, the aircraft needs to do medium-short range pop-up attacks as it’s the best way of reducing the amount of time for spaa’s to react.
Unfortunately this tactic puts you within range of almost all top tier spaa (excluding the baguette launcher).
The playstyle of the Kh-38 (debatable for the Hammer) makes you completely invulnerable to spaa.
XD, meanwhile the Japanese:
Type 10 - 2010
Type 16 -2016
TKX - 2000-2010
ICV (P) - 2024(?)
RCV (P) - 2024 (?)
Mavericks wouldn’t be so bad if they actually un-gimped them. Their flight profile is wrong which was bug reported. Community Bug Reporting System
Then go play the T-90M, see how that goes.
I play T-90M and its quite a good tank.
While Abrams offers better reload and Mobility, T-90M offers superior:
-Protection
-Awareness
-Survivability
So yea T-90M is not bad by any means.
Yes he did, I see him every America post, if post talking about improve American vehicle or aircraft he will be there and said no need because it already balance or it already perfect. Not sure why
It’s only decent because a majority of the GRB players are idiots. It’s such an easy tank to fight, but because so many players just aim around center mass it just gets away with more than it should.
I did better in the 90M yet hated it more than the BVM. Seriously hate the 4kph reverse
Its not, ever since autoloaders introduced T-Series survivability increased a lot.
In fact after turret basket and FCS addition Abrams and Leopards became much easier tanks to deal with, just shoot them from their Side or Lfp they either get one shot or heavily crippled.
Not to mention they also increased spalling on Leopards quite a lot on Lfp shots.
In principle, the T-90Ms are made entirely from the T-90A, with the rear of the turret cut off to make it longer and Relikt armor and updated electronics added.
In War Thunder, only in name.
SEPv2 and SEP are literally the exact same thing as the 1992 baseline M1A2, except better thermals and, in SEPv2’s case, being heavier and slower.
Because Gaijin did not bother to model a single armor upgrade the tank went through on that 14 year timeframe.
I’m not even going to talk about the controversial hull- both SEP and SEPv2 should have better turret armor on the sides and front, officially confirmed and verified, but Gaijin refuses to model it still.
So… no, we don’t have any vehicle past 1992, actually.
In fact, if anything, they are all even worse than what the 1992 one should be, given the Mía modelled and underperforming fuel tank bulkheads and turret ring (leaving aside all of the composite armor matters).
AIM is also missing its historical KE-W A2 shell (slightly worse than M829A2), and SEPv3 is missing its historical M829A3 shell (slightly better than DM53) which at least would make it feel like an upgrade in one way compared to SEP, A2, HC, etc.