Making an argument that the US needs to be buffed because of the age of their vehicles is “older” compared to other nations is not the way to go.
You gotta compare it’s capabilities. I believe ARB is pretty balanced (maybe Sweden is a bit underwhelming?). GRB is what I have an issue with. Even then, it’s not that bad
The SepV3(still uses the A2), should’ve been added when the 2A7 and T-90M was introduced. Instead we got a copy paste SepV1 with roof tiles.
The AGM-84 should’ve been added along with the Hammer. The Mavericks is like a relic compared to other agms at top tier.
Buddy there’s no concrete evidence that says that, there’s a name of some unknown person that claims it somewhat offers similar level of protection, no tests have been made nor they’ve made a video of it. Also you’ve not brought a proof of your claims that the Army did not make any hull improvements from the base M1 to the SEPV2, still waiting…
I like how you say unknown when it was a claimrd by a then VP for GDLS
Also we can debate all we want about Abrams hull when this was addressed back in 2023. Unless you found definitive evidence to support improved hull armor prior to SEPV3
Arguing about something that’s classified is like pouring water in a desert, also now it’s time to see if Gaijoob going to add the NGAP to the SEPV3 and fix the turret ring which would help alot and make the Abrams worth the grind.
SEP V3 and T-80BVM Mod 23 can 100% be in the game by now, as long as the SEP V3 doesn’t introduce anything OP.
While it would give the US an equal to the HAMMER/KH-38, I believe this shouldn’t be added until the SPAA problem is resolved. Even then, the Mav is still 100% workable.
According to some of the sources available the PW-229 engines were fitted on F-15E 90-0233 and up. Photos of this specific aircraft can already be dated back to 1993.
Regarding NGAPs armor, gaijin is going to have to make an educated guess since there are literally no figures out there since it’s highly classified. That being said, considering sepv3 was a response to the T14 Armata you can probably make a safe guestimation that it probably offers 600 KE plus armor on the hull. And that’s also based on the fact that the army in the early 90s in testing managed to get a 35% increase in KE on the m1a2s hull(550mm KE of armor) which was 30 years ago. The turret is probably close to 850mm to 1000mm KE on the turret.
Every new day brings a new amazing way for people here to moan about Russian tanks…Amazing just how much people invest their time and mind into thinking of a new way to cry about a made up story which makes themselves a victim of a non existent threat
While I do agree with the sentiment, CAS gameplay heavily leans in Russia and France’s favor.
Yes mavericks can be used in top tier but it cannot be used the same way as the Kh-38s and Hammers. For mavericks to be used effectively, the aircraft needs to do medium-short range pop-up attacks as it’s the best way of reducing the amount of time for spaa’s to react.
Unfortunately this tactic puts you within range of almost all top tier spaa (excluding the baguette launcher).
The playstyle of the Kh-38 (debatable for the Hammer) makes you completely invulnerable to spaa.
