Just because it’s realistic doesn’t mean it’s good. I don’t want to play on a flat and open map, just like I don’t want to play on a poorly designed city map.
Don’t tell me to play arcade just because I want to not play on a terrible map. Should I tell you to go play sim if you don’t like how RB is?
That is actually false.
Urban environment is worst possible environment for armored warfare, where all tanks advantages are negated.
Enable barrel collisions and you’ll see how not cool the urban environment is for tanks…
Generally maps should get bigger the higher you go in BR.
The fact that I can see maps like Sweden or Advance to the Spawn Rhine above 7.7 is incredibly annoying.
A very evil part of me wishes they would do this honestly…
Old Maginot followed this forumula relatively well…
Fulda kinda does as well but its abit worse than Maginot even with the changes to the latter
(Still better than certain other maps)
Also one pet peeve i have is that they added the arcade versions of certain maps into RB and i wish they would get rid of them.
Fulda sucks so bad it’s not even a joke. It’s a CQB map disguised as a long map.
Long range maps should be the future for GRB top tier, anyone that likes <400m engagements/CQB brawling should stay below 9.3; as the vehicles above that range were almost entirely designed for medium to long range engagements.
It’s the exact same case as the one I like to call ‘The Fox 3 syndrome’ when people cries over guns only/no ARH modes for top tier planes, it only shows how people doesn’t understand how it works the tech they like.
inb4 but muh sabres dont have TTW >1
As someone who mostly plays top tier, I much prefer the longer range maps, especially in my Challenger xD
No one said it had to be open, there’s plenty of cover and even a town on the big version of Poland.
Being a US main, I love to see a challenger on my team to help take out Leo2a7. Those top Leo’s have some of the jankiest armor. I just wish the matchmaker was USSR v NATO. Germany can use a nerf as well.
I feel like top tier maps should be about 5km in total distance across, giving 1km to get to engagement range for both sides, and engagement distances would be up to 3km. This would allow people to maneuver and position, while not wasting time being too large.
I’d much prefer a EC persistent game mode on a map the size of the Air RB maps, even if they are lower fidelity.
