Its not a loaded question its just a very simple question. Youre ignoring it, because it shows how dumb the percentage argument is.
Not how bigger works
If you actually cared to read anything then youd see that ive said multiple times here that the Leopards are the strongest tanks but in the case of weakspots youre just coping big time and youd rather do some wonky percentage calculations than just concede that a smaller target is indeed harder to hit than a bigger one.
like I’m sorry but the Russian MBT’s are some of the most mid tanks at top tier, the only saving grace for Russia is the inability for Nato mains to hit their rather consistent weak spots and the actually powerful Russian CAS
The radarm missiles are not vastly better at all.
The 120Cs are still great missiles.
it’s marginally more effective, not some huge leap like you’re making out man, I’ve got F15s and working on the Su30.
For a start their ability to dodge more missiles effectively, more counter measures, better SPAA in thier teams as well as reliable missiles and platforms?
the su 30 in GRB is substantially better at ground attack but is no where near as dominant in the air.
not in the slightest? they massively affect flight performance for how tedious they are to use, VS the strong af new SPAA at top tier.
hence why FnF is actually more useful even if it is a maverick.
Never thought I’d be saying that but it is there.
so where is my confirmation bias and lack of self awareness in what i said? if youre gonna give a response like that to a perfectly valid response at least back yourself up.
For high altitude long range Air RB shots sure but i dont see how the Aim120 would not be straight up worse than the 77-1 in ground rb situations
Do you have a plane with an AESA? Because let me tell you its a lot more than just marginally better and having more than 90 degree azimuth is amazing.
Yeah that is why you take both, the EFT can handle the additional weight and Brimstones are great at killing LDIRCM helis not to mention that you can just pump them out at once getting rid of the weight and covering your SPICEs
I’d actually have to agree @H_ngma here.
R-77-1s vastly superior in short range engagements, much better pull, better time to target, theyve also got advantages for dealing with targets in MP. If you are using F-15E or F16C for CAS then you don’t get the ESA DL advantage either.
C5s are great if you get them up high and/or fast, but pretty poor low and/or slow. Which I found fairly typical in GRB, maps are too small and you spend too much time.defensive these days
Valid but that would make the SU30SM2 the more efficient solution then since it can do both CAP and CAS effectively at the same time. For the F15s youre either scaling down on CAS capabilities with the GE or on CAP with the 15E. Thats essentially what i mean when i say that US CAS is behind the curve the best US CAS planes are outdated airframes while everyone else uses multirole top of the line planes
I don’t tend to go that low when i do play at those BRs bar in the dedicated strike platforms, like the JH7A which is extremely difficult to use now adays.
they are superior in short range engagements but you’re not supposed to be in them in these planes, even in GRB, plus the 15s get the aim9M shich being smokeless makes them massively more dangerous in a game mode with no diamonds identifying them.