So we then can move the 11.3+ NATO vehicles up?
Isn’t that what I just said?
you didnt say the part to increase max BR, why it is important?
Because only moving 11.3 up wont do shit, every tank would just be 12.0 then
2 Likes
I said 11.3+, not just 11.3s.
Stuff like the SEP, 2A7, and Type 10 too.
i get what you said but u missed the important parts
Which is…?
mf i will literally…
nvm then
1 Like
If the important part is moving them all up by a reasonable degree, then I’ve expressed that already.
It’s still a skill issue that’s your not paying attention to them. It has a gun, and mobility, and no armor…
Not really?
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Are you going to say that the Leo 2K is bad?
I didn’t say the Type 90 was bad, I was just saying it’s not OP/its balanced.
If most NATO 11.3+ vehicles get moved up by 0.3, then I’d agree with you.
There’s no reason why an M1A1 HC or Type 90 should be facing 2A4s / M1 Abrams.
If you can’t see the problem in that, then you clearly are enjoying being able to stomp on them.
It’s a downtier…
Everything seems godlike in a downtier. Panther D in a downtier is godlike. Tiger H1 in a downtier is godlike. Leopard 1 in a downtier is godlike. The list goes on dude.
I don’t think the M1 Abrams is ‘godlike’ against 9.7s.
Though they used to be when they were steamrolling 9.3s.
Do you see where I’m going with this?
Are you going to say that those 9.3s should still be facing 10.7s like the 2A4 and Abrams… because everything seems godlike in a downtier?
What’s the point of decompression?
And the reason why I say NATO tanks in specific is because they’re generally better in most ways compared to Russian / Chinese vehicles.
Armour is the only thing going for them.
Besides that, mobility, survivability, firepower, and versatility are better (in a lot of cases for 11.3+ NATO vehicles).
I agree with decompression, it’s needed across the board, but it needs to all happen at the same time.
We can start at top tier - which is probably the best place anyways.
Again, move 11.3+ NATO vehicles up, other than things like the Ariete and Challies. There’s no reason why the VT4A1 should be the same BR as the 2A7V.
What’s the point of complaining about any one particular vehicle at that point, it’s always a pivot to “decompression” when the original arguement is shit; oh noes my 2A4 can face an M1A1 better make the M1A1 face 2A7Vs for balance.
Well, let’s say the 2A4 stayed at 10.7, the M1A1 went to 11.7, and the 2A7V went to 12.7.
The 2A4 only rarely has to face the M1A1, and cannot ever face the M1A1 HC.
As for the M1A1, it will only rarely have to face the 2A7, instead of every 0.7+ uptier.
I think that’s pretty fair - don’t you think?
Hell, you wouldn’t even have to constantly face 2A7Vs / SEPs/ Type 10s in your ZTZ99A if that were the case.
1 Like
Fixing the transmission issues on the Type 10 and reducing the time of reload for the accurate value and moving TKX (P) to 12.0 should be fine to all those complains (sarcasm).
All needs to happen at once so no one gets an advantage over others in that time span. Mostly so people don’t complain.
1 Like
I could get behind that.
Funnily enough, that’s something Gaijin has to work on.
For example, moving down vietnam era vehicles, like the CL-13B Mk.6, to decompress 9.3-10.3 just made it worse for 7.0-8.3 vehicles. If they had thought about that before they implemented those changes, I think Air RB around those BRs would be much more lively.
1 Like