Unfortunately I can only test vehicles that I have Spaded/Experted, just to keep things equal.
There are more vehicles I can test however, but it takes time.
Unfortunately I can only test vehicles that I have Spaded/Experted, just to keep things equal.
There are more vehicles I can test however, but it takes time.
The Tiger 1 can’t be played like a brawler because every tank you face against at its BR can pen you easily at <1000m. Even if you angle the hull 45 you can still be penned through the lower sides of your hull.
Personally I like the 5.7 Porsche Tiger better than the H1. It accelerates a lot quicker, has better frontal armor, and can go in reverse just as fast as it goes forward. You just can’t angle it otherwise people shoot through your hull cheeks.
That’s great! It’s over OP, stop complaining, this esteemed gentleman has demonstrated, beyond shadow of a doubt, that Tiger I is undertiered with his single good game in this vehicle! /s
Now, lets get serious.
Let’s look at your stats in heavy tanks across the board:
https://thunderskill.com/en/stat/markimash/vehicles/r#type=army&role=heavy_tank&country=all
you managed to get significantly (5% or more) better winrate in almost every other heavy tank you play, but you still ,somehow, think that Tiger I is fine where it is? Can you explain your logic here?
They will do that anyway and as soon as they see those aerials.I’ll take the Tiger 1 every time.
lol fr
Win rate is not a good metric to determine how good a vehicle is. Also, tiger is in the worst part of the “german main” experience.
I would also say that most heavies are decent where they are. I have been playing mostly heavies recently and it has actually been rather fun. The US 6.7 heavies, T32, tiger, and tog.
There are a couple that are in awkward spots. Like the churchill mk7